“Obviously, we understand what the problems are — high cost of energy, poor infra, high cost of business,” he said during the briefing of the Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) with the Senate. We’re trying to address those, but what I’m trying to say is that if we (do) address the problem of low incomes by raising the wages by legislative (measures)… then these other factors that are required by investors to come will happen much later,” the NEDA chief added.
Tbh, I don’t want investors who want to further wage inequality. Sa inyo na investments nyo. What we want are investors who are socially aware and just.
Example of investors we don’t like:
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/DaSn0iqzVv4
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Ay nice!
The only bot so far that’s been useful in this instance.
Why does it feel like a false dichotomy? if they want to attract investors while enacting both the short term solution of higher wages and long term solution of lowering costs why not give said investors a tax incentive that way they have a strict timeframe to lower the costs of doing business here and at the same time appeasing the populace and at the same time without causing inflation due to the increase in money supply
Aren’t there a lot of studies stating raising minimum wage is better for the citizens and the economy as a whole (especially if the minimum wage hasn’t increased for a long time)?
