• HaSch@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Beijing’s top official for the city visited it in April, he did not meet the real estate developers association, which represents some of the richest families, raising questions over whether the interests of the wealthy clans are even a major concern to the top leadership.

    Presumably questions such as “WTF?”, “You do know what a communist is, right?”, and “Have you recently been experiencing dizziness, eyesight problems, or weakness/numbness radiating from one side of your face, arms, or legs?”

  • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Send this to Ultras who think the current CPC is on the “capitalist road.” I’m wondering what the supposed environmental concerns were. I wouldn’t imagine golf courses are the most environmentally friendly. Don’t you need a bunch of herbicide to maintain the grass? Lawns are a huge waste of space. I’m assuming it’s just bourgeois cope.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’d find some technicality or something, most likely insisting that they are still revisionist capitalist roaders because the golf course existed in the first place.

      • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        While they conveniently ignore that despite China’s attempts at restoring democracy, Hong Kong is still a de-facto British colonial territory. The handover was in name only.

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m wondering what the supposed environmental concerns were.

      Envsci major here: golf courses are the worst fucking thing in a city short of an oil well. Approximately 0% of the plants there are helpful or even remotely suited to the ecosystem (especially one like South China) and worth preserving, it’s hostile to wildlife and pollinators, is toxic due to the excessive pesticide use, exacerbates soil erosion, and is generally a massive resource sink. Put some gardens with native flowering plants around those apartments or on the balconies, some native trees as well, and it’ll be worlds better than a golf course. Not sure about this one but speaking generally, an urban neighborhood with high density housing can actually integrate into the ecosystem and be sustainable if managed right, far more than golf courses can at least.

  • Absolute@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m very excited/interested to see how the CPC tackles the housing problem in Hong Kong. This is a great development to see

  • BenEarlDaMarxist@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nice. Never really was keen on golf, outside of its weird gimmick of “less strokes = more likely to win the competition”, the comically large open courses aren’t really helping since I kinda see them as wastes of open area.

    • JucheBot1988@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a dumb sport for people who don’t like sports, but who do like to spend a lot of money on gear.

      This is my totally unbiased opinion.