I personally am quite against it. I joined Lemmy to stay away from the toxicity on Meta’s platforms. I don’t want any corporate bodies on the fediverse either and possibly doing to the fediverse what Google did to XMPP

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have completely blocked and defederated from threads given the uncontrolled transphobia taking place there

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems clear to me that Facebook should have no other interest in this other than ultimately making money. Thus it is antithetical to Lemmy and the fediverse in general, and should be treated as such.

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they’re there to make money. They want to take over the place and then absorb it in other to eliminate competition. Which is what they’ve always been doing.

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I’m sure that one-click hosting for fediverse instances exist, I’d imagine most instance admins would be using general dedicated server hosting. It would allow for finer control of the backend.

        • BlueSharkEnjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My main mastodon uses one of the hosted services, which I’m totally fine with. Moderating a community is hard enough without adding extra sysadmin work on top, and I’m happy to donate towards the running costs whatever way the admins choose is best to run it.

  • surlybaer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreeing with the general sentiment. Anytime the big five ‘engage’ with the open source community they just use and abuse it. IMHO it would be in the best interest of the Fediverse to reject all partnership offers from the corps and make sure to defederate any instances they stand up.

    • fbievan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do realize that most of these projects are funded by cooperations, right? You do realize that the EU has a mastodon instance, right? You do realize that Mozilla has a mastodon instance, right? You also realize that mastodon is a cooperation rigbt? (Granted it is a nonprofit).

      You do realize that most mastodon instantces are in some way affilated with a cooperation, right? Just by proxy. Using their servers, etc

  • corytheboyd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can already see it. They will offer a solution to the identity “problem”, moving user accounts to their network. They will offer “free” hosting solutions so that more people can run communities without self-hosting. Over the course of years they will slowly inject ads, tracking, the typical enshitificaton fare.

    I’m tired.

  • samsy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They really think we never learned from google+ or WhatsApp? They implement OpenSource, greedy milk it to the ground and close it or set their propetary code over it. Nothing has changed, we should be worried about activitypub since the greedy five are interested in it.

  • missingno@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that Threads won’t launch in Europe because it’s literally illegal there tells me everything I need to know about this platform. Do not trust Facebook, do not federate with Facebook.

  • Jyrdano@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank god Kbin allows to block an entire instance. Although I’d prefer if the fediverse collectively defederated from them.

  • sickpusy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As I said in another post, this oddly reminds me of the XMPP days and how Facebook and Google supported it in the beginning and then dumped it once they had enough users over to their side.

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People should note: this is an instance meta community not a place for general discussion outside of lemmy.blahaj.zone

  • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of people are using the same user handle accross platforms. That’s an easy way to deanonimize people’s data, and that’s what is Meta aiming for (besides potential EEE tactics).

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basically a big brick wall between the two instances. Their posts and users wouldn’t show up here. It’d be like they don’t exist.