• Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, “Illegal to strike” sounds a lot like “forced labor”.

    The fuck they gonna do, chain them to a desk? Newsflash assholes, jailing teachers isn’t gonna fucking put them back in classrooms.

    • bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      No but it will convince them to quit and they city can hire cheaper teachers that “aren’t woke”.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The city can hire cheaper people, but not teachers. That’s been the problem the last few years - not enough teachers (because they’re treated and paid like shit), so the requirements to stand in front of a class continue to drop.

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I partly agree with you. Mostly on that on matters of this that they had a plan, and wasn’t just wonton aggression against education. That is, their only plan was for the results, not the methodology.

      • garrett@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a feeling that we’re already skewing this way nationally with low pay and high academic requirements.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, they’ll pull a Reagan and tell everyone striking that they’re fired.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Fun” fact: Reagan’s little stunt with the air traffic controllers left the government with a severe shortage in talent and experience in air traffic controllers for a good decade afterwards. Turns out you can’t just fire everyone in the country who does a given job without consequences, particularly with a job that is high stress.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Making it illegal for people to strike seems to violate our rights for freedom of expression. Or am I misinterpreting that right? I’m a little fuzzy when it comes to precedents and shit for laws and rulings

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Striking is not the same as speech. It goes far beyond. They can’t stop teachers from protesting or speaking out. No law could do that. They can, however, immediately fire and replace anyone who refuses to work, absent strike protections. They can call in the Pinkertons to break picket lines absent strike protections.

      It’s not about expressing themselves. It’s about collective bargaining with the threat of the employer fully losing access to the labor if they refuse.

      And the NLRA specifically does not cover public sector employees, so they can absolutely ban teachers from striking. They shouldn’t, but they certainly could.

    • regul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You would think, wouldn’t you? But this approach is quite common. Biden’s “deal” to prevent the rail strike was to make it illegal for them to strike. Air traffic controllers were also legally prevented from striking in the 80s, but did a wildcat strike anyway. Reagan fired all of them and then banned them from ever being rehired.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could see some groups where a ban on strikes could be reasonable. Police, fire brigade, and ambulance come to mind. Even then though, it should be controls, not absolute. e.g. fire brigade have to give the army time to mobilise and prepare to cover for them. Teachers are not one of them. An absolute ban is just an invitation to drive work conditions into the floor, and cripple the service…

  • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We should have passed legislation that capped class size to 20 kids. If there aren’t enough teachers, tough shit. Also, teachers should be paid a good wage and we shouldn’t be paying for schools out of property taxes, for fuck sake.

    • girl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Strongly agree with all your points. But what would it look like to not have enough teachers, alongside laws that cap class sizes? Millions of kids would go uneducated. We would also need a strong push to add more teachers to the mix, something like actually paying people to go to school to become teachers along with good wages and benefits.

  • TheForkOfDamocles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Solidarity!

    My little district in southern Oregon has been investing heavily in instructional aids, counselors, and building upgrades. I am a Specials teacher and work with every student from preschool through fifth grade, and in just over a year, I already have seen better behaviors and a more positive atmosphere in my three schools. We also have seen regular COL increases, plus a larger bump twice in four years.

    PDX teachers deserve their demands. Union Strong!

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nice of WWeek to point out that this is Republicans. The KGW article just referred to “lawmakers,” which is a touch misleading.