• nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Car manufacturers did a lot of lobbying to class them as light trucks rather than cars so they can benefit from more lax emissions regulations. Then marketed the hell out of them as the more they sold the less they have to comply with the stricter emissions regulations for normal cars.

      So as with every shit thing these days the big reason is to increase profits at any expense.

      After successfully lobbying lawmakers to class these vehicles as light trucks rather than cars, binding SUVs to less stringent fuel efficiency standards, the industry set about slotting them into almost every arena of American life.

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/01/suv-conquered-america-climate-change-emissions

    • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the structure the government set in place prioritizes the biggest heaviest vehicles over smaller cars that are more fuel efficient in absolute terms, but are disqualified due to not meeting the exponential curve of MPG per lbs that make up the limits.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A RAV4 starts at 29k, a sienna starts at 37k. A small SUV is usually cheaper than the cheapest minivan from the same brand. Couple that with the ease of dealing with child carseats in a higher vehicle and there’s your reason.

      A small suv is simply the logical choice for small families.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s comparing apples to oranges. The sienna seats eight people. You have to compare it with the highlander, which starts at 39K. The rav4 is better compared the camry, which starts at 26K or the corolla

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean you’re illustrating the same rationale in a different way. Anyone who’s hauled kids around in a sedan knows it sucks, so you go shopping for a family hauler. Traditionally you get a minivan, so you check the price, and it’s nuts. You look at their SUV selection and you find a hit. Three thousand over a camry via car-payments is cheap compared to straining your back every day.

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People need to be made to pay the full cost for these things, for the CO2, for the damage to infrastructure, oe the air pollution, for the risk to people. That or regulate them out of existence.

      • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Registration is managed at the state level. In Minnesota weight is not a factor. The registration tax for passenger class vehicles (cars, vans and pickups rated at less than one-ton, and one-ton passenger vans) is determined by the vehicle’s base value and age. Minimum tax for vehicles 10 years old and older is $35.

        The newer and more expensive your vehicle the higher the tax. In terms of road repair costs, that is collected via a gas excise tax.