• Muisyn@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You should never be incentivised to break the rules in a game. Cynical fouls have been a plague for a long time.

    • FrameworkisDigimon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also imagine VAR taking 5 minutes on each sin bin decision on top of what we have already

      If they had a sin bin and somehow decided the way to implement it was “we will review every sin bin decision and then put the player in the bin” rather than “we will put players in the bin and then review the decision, inviting them to rejoin the game before their time in the bin is up if the binning was unjust” that would be insane.

    • lagerjohn@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The ten minute sin bin rule works great in rugby for yellows. I’ve thought for a long time it should be brought into football. Provided they mic up the refs and allow us to hear their deliberations.

    • owiseone23@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tactical fouls have had a huge negative effect on the product on the field. This rule makes them worse to commit so hopefully it limits them.

    • KonigSteve@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Let’s try and ruin football even more

      God you all are so stuck on tradition. Change is ok. The sport isn’t perfect.

  • Ser_Crow@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is class, would rather them do it for professinal and intentional fouls that dont quite equate to a red but a yellow is not enough

    • Om_Nom_Zombie@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biggest issue with those fouls is that the rules currently only caution players if advantage isn’t played.

      So defenders can blatantly impede an attack and impact it heavily, but if attackers keep the ball and a free kick isn’t given to there is no punishment.

      • dickgilbert@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is that specific to professional fouls? Because referees are 100% allowed to return to a foul they played advantage on and give a card. I’ve never heard of the laws stating they cannot.

    • LimberGravy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biggest issue I have with the sport is how binary a lot of the rules are despite how low scoring it is. Sending offs and penalties basically kill a lot of games but there is basically no middle ground to them really. Sin bins are a great start imo, next I would love more indirect free kicks in the box.

  • JoltyFVG@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuckin what? Bin VAR and stop all this nonsense. Let’s just go back to playing the game…

    • Constant__18@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      VAR isn’t the problem.

      Poor use and badly constructed rules around its use is the problem

  • Masam10@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not sure about the sin bin thing before I hear more but one thing I think Football has needed for a long long time is allowing only the captain to approach the referee.

    It’s frustrating to watch when a foul or something happens and then you get half the pitch sprint over to the ref to try and influence him into making some kind of decision.

    Having the ref’s micced up so you can hear a conversation between them and the captain would make for good viewing whilst also improving the overall game I think.

    • 123rig@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also the new trend of when a foul is given all the opposition players nonchalantly run over or next to the ball to stop a quick free kick. So frustrating. In rugby that free kick would be advanced 10 yards.

        • limeflavoured@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not at all serious suggestion, loosely based on some NFL rules, where the non-penalised team can choose between two outcomes:

          Let the other team choose whether to advance it 10 yard or give the player a 2 minute sin binning.

    • LeJeuDuProchainTrain@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      100% agree. I’m at a point of just card anyone who yells at the ref. It’s insane how much time is wasted just watching grown men bitch and someone to stand one foot from the ball until the ref makes them back up.

  • Ludenz-@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s not a bad idea in principle, but it’s just another way for officials to make inconsistent decisions.

    • cuentanueva@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And without “net play time” it’s gonna be even MORE inconsistent. Some players will lose like 2 minutes of actual game play, while other may lose 8/9…

    • ThereWillBeGoals@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not really another way though is it? Or rather, or it’s not adding more decisions to be made. Previously it was “Do I give this person a a yellow or nothing for saying that to me” and now it’s “Do I give this person an orange or nothing for saying that to me”.

      • FrameworkisDigimon@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In that specific situation you almost feel like the hypothetical orange card for a sin bin could work like so:

        • orange, yellow = off
        • yellow, orange = sin bin
        • orange, orange = sin bin
        • and a third orange is always a red

        This way referees who worry about being blamed for “ruining the game” with an early double yellow might punish players/teams where they’d otherwise find any excuse to avoid the second yellow.

        This really would allow for more inconsistent decisions but it would facilitate punishing behaviours that ought to be punished but which routinely go unpunished.

        The rules (“Laws” I know) keep getting written to be more objective, but the pursuit of objectivity is foolish when a lot of the decisions are always going to be subjective. Increasing the level of subjective discretion could actually make refs feel empowered to make calls they’re otherwise hesitant to make because everything is so binary and clashes with the human element. Or it might not, but the situation now definitely needs fixing somehow… all that can go wrong is a different wrong.

  • paper_zoe@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The VAR stuff yesterday, Sin Bins today. It’s like an advent calendar of ways to ruin the most popular sport in the world. I’m looking forward to seeing what dogshit idea they’ll give us tomorrow

  • smallTimeCharly@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sin bins were piloted in 2018-19 and led to the Football Association reporting a 38% total reduction in dissent across 31 leagues.

    They were then introduced across all levels of grassroots football from the 2019-20 season in an attempt to to improve levels of respect and fair play.

    The rule change was then implemented up to step five of the National League system and tier three and below in women’s football.

    This echoes my experience of them in grassroots 11 a side and sanctioned small sided football (in 5-7 a side they are two minutes).

    I don’t see why they wouldn’t also work in professional football.

    At grassroots level they have the big advantage of not having to deal with all the paperwork and admin of fining players.

    One example I’ve seen them used quite well in is where you have a handbags at dawn type scenario with a bit of a melee and some pushing and shoving. A sin bin each for the two main antagonists tends to calm the game down without needing such drastic action as a red card.

  • thejackalreborn@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think this would be horrendous, you’d just see the most negative time wasting anti-football as teams try to play out the period with reduced numbers.