A spokesperson for the Russian government clarified that it has rejected requests to interview Vladimir Putin from reputable media outlets

The Kremlinā€™s first public response to Tucker Carlsonā€™s announcement that heā€™s landed an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin was to fact-check the former Fox News host.

On Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed that Carlson had indeed interviewed Putin, but took issue with Carlsonā€™s claim that ā€œnot a single Western journalist has botheredā€ to interview Russiaā€™s president throughout the nationā€™s war with Ukraine, which has raged for more than two years.

ā€¦

Putinā€™s refusal to sit down with most Western media outlets likely has less to do with accusations of bias so much as an unwillingness to be subjected to legitimate scrutiny of his government. Russia has been accused of committing atrocities and war crimes in its offensive against Ukraine, including the unlawful executions of civilians. Putinā€™s government is also infamous for its frequent detainment of political rivals and critics, as well as the cloud of mysterious deaths and poisonings of those in his orbit.

Whether Carlson will question Putin on any of these matters remains to be seen. The former Fox News hostā€™s history of granting softball interviews to controversial influencers, political figures, and authoritarian leaders, indicates this is unlikely. Given everything we know about Putinā€™s propaganda machine, itā€™s clear that in Carlson, the Russian government sees a safe opportunity to broadcast its carefully crafted messaging to American viewers.

  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I do listen to people, and most fucking hate latinx. Maybe you are the one with your ears pluggedā€¦ One latino person does not speak for all latinos. Thatā€™s not how race works. Thatā€™s not how it has ever worked.

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Exactly, one person doesnā€™t speak for everyone. Ignore people who say ā€œlatins donā€™t like Latinxā€ because they donā€™t speak for everyone and itā€™s a Latin American term anyways. Listen to those around you and youā€™ll know what to use. Weā€™re in agreement.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        Ā·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Uhhhhh no you are literally not even listening to your own adviceā€¦

        MOST PEOPLE DO NOT LIKE IT. That is SPECIFICALLY NOT ignoring their opinion on the matter, you brainless worm. Most Mexicans and Spanish people do not like it. Most do not like it. Start fucking LISTENING.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          You think because I added more context behind the word Latinx that Iā€™m advocating for it to be the general term for a group of people, right? I was trying to figure out how you got so confused and angry.

          Either that or you feel that by not deferring to your expertise on Mexicans and Spanish people, itā€™s equivalent to not listening to others, which makes me a hypocrite because Iā€™m saying to listen to individuals.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            Ā·
            10 months ago

            When the vast majority donā€™t like something youā€™re pushing on them, it makes you a dick. Stop being a dick.