• guywithoutaname@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not true. If you define the circumference in terms of pi, you can define the circumference exactly.

        • h3ndrik@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Was going to say the same. Also π isn’t infinite. Far from it. it’s not even bigger than 4. It’s representation in the decimal system is just so that it can’t be written there with a finite number of decimal places. But you could just write “π”. It’s short, concise and exact.

          And by that definition 0.1 is also infinite… My computer can’t write that with a finite amount of digits in base 2, which it uses internally.

          So… I’m crying salty tears, too.

          [Edit: And we don’t even need transcendental numbers or other number systems. A third also doesn’t have a representation. So again following the logic… you can divide a cake into 5 pieces, but never into 3?!]

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Not sure where you’re going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any integer base because it’s irrational.