The House has renewed its push on legislation that would ban TikTok if its Beijing-based parent company doesn’t divest from the popular social media platform.
Edit: I’m not sure why I can’t reply to the commenter that replied to my comment. So I’ll quote him and reply here:
Regardless of your opinion on TikTok, you shouldn’t be okay with the government targeting a specific app.
Would you feel the same if it were Grindr, under the guise of “protecting children?”
How about encrypted messaging apps because the government doesn’t like that they can’t read messages?
This whole thing is dangerously close to infringing on freedoms over ideology, rather than just being about foreign surveillance.
TikTok is an extreme example. If it were Grindr under the guise of “protecting the children,” I’d say it’s bullshit. But let’s not be naive here. TikTok is made and controlled by the Chinese government through a Chinese company. It’s an actual national security concern, so yes, I’m okay with what they’re going through right now. Deservedly so.
Tiktok is cancer, so I’m okay with this.
Edit: I’m not sure why I can’t reply to the commenter that replied to my comment. So I’ll quote him and reply here:
TikTok is an extreme example. If it were Grindr under the guise of “protecting the children,” I’d say it’s bullshit. But let’s not be naive here. TikTok is made and controlled by the Chinese government through a Chinese company. It’s an actual national security concern, so yes, I’m okay with what they’re going through right now. Deservedly so.
Regardless of your opinion on TikTok, you shouldn’t be okay with the government targeting a specific app.
Would you feel the same if it were Grindr, under the guise of “protecting children?”
How about encrypted messaging apps because the government doesn’t like that they can’t read messages?
This whole thing is dangerously close to infringing on freedoms over ideology, rather than just being about foreign surveillance.