• considine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      When you decommodify a thing the state takes a role to ensure the good or service is provided to all. You can have a mixed system with private and public construction. But as long as there is a robust public housing sector, prices for all houses will be much lower than in the current system where we have scarcity.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I read something recently analyzing what tends to happen when there’s tons of artificially cheap public housing. Market forces determine housing prices regardless of government interference, so when the govt rules by decree that their public housing will be cheaper, the price differential doesn’t go away, it just changes form. And more importantly, it changes hands. The price difference changes form from money into power, and it changes hands from the landlord into the govt agency or official in charge of determining who gets to live there and benefit from the lower cost. Make sense?

        I don’t disagree that housing costs are out of control. I think everyone is missing the point though, and the cause. It isn’t mean rich people being evil bastards charging people too much. Right now what we are seeing is the natural result of decades of exponential economic growth. Real estate is an asset like any other with prices strongly positively correlated with other asset classes. If everything is growing exponentially like equities, of course real estate is going to grow along with them. I don’t know what the solution is, but it certainly isn’t anything suggested in this thread.

        • considine@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So instead of having people spend 60% of their income on housing we will have some slightly annoyed people who aren’t in the neighborhood they want to be in, spending <20% of their income on housing. Sounds like an improvement to me.

    • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The billions and billions of our tax dollars we spend on our military are largely used to make weapon manufacturers more wealth.

      You could easily provide healthcare for all and housing for all with that money and still have a huge surplus of cash.