• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ok, so what you are saying is that the bus service should be replaced by rail:

    Predictable - No random traffic, vastly imporves reliabillity of the system.

    Disaster resistant - Less traffic in the system means less impact of disasters.

    Time tested - rail has been used for longer than cars/busses.

    Cost effective - After a large initial investment the large capacity of the system compensates for the large cost.

    Idiot proof - this does not exist, but rail gets close with a lot of added control and safety systems to improve safety and reliabillity.