• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I had a Jolla smart phone, it was pretty great but it also quickly became apparent that the company had no real intention to make Sailfish the Android-compatible, open and privacy-friendly OS I was hoping it’d be. Selling licenses to customers to put the OS on third party hardware really killed it for me.

    Kinda surprised they are still around, but I guess knowing the right magical words to whisper to investors is a good enough business strategy. They’ve done it with blockchain, now it’s AI.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 month ago

    Jolla says the phone will sell for €299 (including a 1-year subscription license for Sailfish OS)

    Emphasis mine. Mate, just what are you doing? A subscription license of a mobile OS? Wat? They could be working together with Purism, Pine64, PostMarketOS and other software+hardware groups trying to make linux phones popular, but instead they are making some proprietary stuff in their corner. Is it really that difficult to work with other people or what’s going on?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      029 days ago

      They are trying to make money to stay afloat. Postmarketos is a community project so it’s not comparable. And neither Purism nor Pine64 seem to be huge commercial successes just like Jolla, though they seem to be doing a bit better.

      • Fonzie!
        link
        fedilink
        15 days ago

        If they need a subscription model for the OS, then maybe it shouldn’t stay afloat. Clearly there’s no money in this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        I have no problem with them making money, far from it. My problem is with how. If their OS didn’t require a friggin subscription service, I’d buy their phone. What happens when I don’t pay for the next payment cycle? My phone gets shut off? The OS stops working? I’m only limited to making phone calls? Fuck that.

        Anti Commercial-AI license

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    i am no fan of the proprietary model here, but i think they disingenuously compare it to the rabbit R1 device.

    i love the idea of an local-llm-in-a-box, and they claim to have a working (minimal featureset) model that could be expanded. the rabbit device is a glorified siri

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1930 days ago

    Yeah nope, Jolla still has some closed source parts, then I’d rather monthly fund a project truly open source, like Mobian or Droidian, and maybe with wider target devices horizons than Sony Experia devices only.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    Seems a hard sell to go subscription on such a niche platform. I wish anyone luck that could challenge the Apple/Android duopoly though.

    • @sabreW4K3OP
      link
      71 month ago

      I haven’t looked into it. But I suspect that if Linux phones can get Kotlin to run natively, we’ll start seeing some of the apps from F-Droid ported over and that will be the turning point.

      • PureTryOut
        link
        fedilink
        91 month ago

        Kotlin isn’t the problem, missing the various Android API’s is.

        • @sabreW4K3OP
          link
          330 days ago

          But a Linux distro can go like for like, like what Google did with Java right? So people wouldn’t have to recreate apps, just tweak them

            • @sabreW4K3OP
              link
              229 days ago

              I feel like, if AOSP was going to be adopted by the Linux community, it would’ve happened already.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                129 days ago

                I’m not sure what “the Linux community” really means but I would bet that pure open source Android based on AOSP are more popular than the non-Android Linux mobile OS combined.

                • @sabreW4K3OP
                  link
                  129 days ago

                  Think PinePhone and Librem Phone,

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Kotlin targets the JVM right? I think you’d need either a port of the runtime (dalvik?) Or an api translation later a la WINE.

        But I don’t actually know anything, so don’t listen to me. Having a fully Foss phone with support for the android app ecosystem would be wonderful though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      830 days ago

      They have been owned by a Russian state-owned telecom corporation for a few years until recent events (Russia currently tries to push Sailfish OS fork as its “russian-made” mobile OS). Original Finnish management has split off to a new independent company with the same name last year, and this looks like their last ditch attempt to continue existing. I don’t expect they will last much longer (the reason why they were bought by Russia in the first place was that Jolla failed as a business).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        129 days ago

        Original Finnish management has split off to a new independent company with the same name last year

        Best business move EVER! Now people have to wonder with whom they’re doing business. Sorta keeps people on their toes. Way better than coming up with a new brand, making it easier for their five customers. /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 month ago

    Wow, what will they think of next!? A subscription for air? For using my own toilet? I hope this company dies quickly…

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      129 days ago

      I welcome competition in the space even if it is imperfect.

  • taanegl
    link
    fedilink
    101 month ago

    Listen, if the phone itself can still run a custom Linux, then I’m all for it. Why? Because Microsoft needs some competition in this space, and my hatred for Microsoft dwarves any subscription fee. But, if they now lock it down like any Android handset, then fudge 'em.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The ai box is 700$ ? Who’s gonna buy it? Anyway, If you anyone want to run local llm on their own phone then try 4bit quantized phi-3.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    830 days ago

    Watching Microsoft begging people to subscribe to the hardware they bought and thinking it is a good idea.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    529 days ago

    It’s a really awesome OS, the UI is one of the slickest and most intuitive gesture based UIs I’ve ever used. But it’s so limited for apps etc. Damn shame, because I enjoyed every minute using it on my Xperia.

  • Justin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    529 days ago

    A subscription for OS updates? That won’t for with most users.

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      229 days ago

      The major advantage of a subscription model is that they don’t need most users, just enough to be financially sustainable.

  • Todd Bonzalez
    link
    fedilink
    329 days ago

    Ultimately [the Jolla Mind2] sounds… a lot less useful than the AI-in-a-device features that companies have been promising for products like the Rabbit R1 or Humane AI Pin.

    What the hell? Why would the device with a dedicated NPU and local models be less useful than the piece-of-shit marketing stunts that everyone hates?

    The Mind2 looks interesting. It solves the issue of your hardware not supporting the requirements to run the model, by providing hardware, and lets you use your existing smartphone to access it remotely. I am curious how it actually performs.

    It might not be a long-term product concept though. All new phones are going to come stock with a lot more than 6 TOPS of AI compute onboard very soon.

    • @sabreW4K3OP
      link
      228 days ago

      People see the term AI and instantly get their backs up. All rational independent thought goes out the window at that point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 month ago

    Wow, what will they think of next!? A subscription for air? For using my own toilet? I hope this company dies quickly…