• streetlights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m confused about this. Striking is used as a means to bring the employer/government to the negotiating table, but there is no government until after the election, so what’s the point?

    • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s targeted to bring the issue to the forefront of people’s minds before they vote.

      They’re not trying to negotiate with the current government, they’re trying to gain support from the people voting the next government in, hoping they’d vote for a party sympathetic to their cause.

      • streetlights@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not entirely convinced that strike action should be used in this way. It’s too easy for the Tories to point at the docs and blame them for waiting times going up.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, but nobody believes them. They trust the doctors more. So, the Tories blaming them would backfire to the doctors advantage,

          • streetlights@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not sure “nobody believes” them, you and me might but the general population is a broad spectrum. Waiting times for routine appointments are already at an all time high and some of that is due to industrial action, this proposed strike will make that worse.

            Striking is an important tool for workers to be used as a last resort to bring an employer to the negotiating table. That’s not the case here, there is no “employer” as such until after the election, so what’s the point? Simply ‘raising awareness’ is a pretty poor justification.