UK Politics@feddit.uk · 6 months ago

Labour Under Fire Over Shoddy Treatment of Dianne Abbot

novaramedia.com

5

16

Labour Under Fire Over Shoddy Treatment of Dianne Abbot

novaramedia.com

UK Politics@feddit.uk · 6 months ago

5

Labour Under Fire Over Shoddy Treatment of Dianne Abbot | Novara Media

novaramedia.com

Labour are under fire over the party leadership's appalling treatment of veteran MP Dianne Abbott. We speak to Martin Forde KC about the state of the party. With Michael Walker.…

Chat

ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
arrow-up
6
arrow-down
1·
edit-2
4 months ago
deleted by creator
- Twig@sopuli.xyz
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  3·
  6 months ago
  Considering the amount of anti-Labour stuff being posted, probably not.
- pixely@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  2
  arrow-down
  2·
  6 months ago
  And the alternative is?
  - XIIIesq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1·
    6 months ago
    A voting system suitable for a multi party democracy rather than fptp.
    - pixely@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1·
      6 months ago
      It’s not a viable alternative to voting labour right now, that’s the point I was making.

UK Politics@feddit.uk

uk_politics@feddit.uk

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

194 users / day
660 users / week
1.8K users / month
6.29K users / 6 months
3 local subscribers
3.09K subscribers
1.99K Posts
16.5K Comments
Modlog