• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s more like paying the ticket without ever showing up in court. And at least where I live, I can do that.

    • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      No - it’s actually not like that at all.

      Google didn’t pay that money just to bypass the formalities along the way to paying a fixed fine - they paid it in order to head off the possibility that they were going to face a jury trial instead of a bench trial, since juries are far more likely to vote in favor of much bigger fines than judges are.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        The prosecution’s own expert estimated that the amount that was paid was the maximum they could expect to get.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think it’s about the fines, it’s about the cost for Google to fight in court and perhaps setting precedent. It’s often just cheaper to pay the fine.