cross-posted from: https://pixelfed.crimedad.work/p/crimedad/705187000877520551

Is this correct for the updated blade guard on a radial arm saw?

The carriage doesn’t go back far enough for the blade guard to fall down behind the fence. I thought the guard was supposed to keep the carriage in the home position until the user lifts it with the lever on the handle. I’m wondering if I did something wrong. Any RAS users know what I’m talking about?

#woodworking #RadialArmSaw #SafetyFirst

@[email protected]

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s funny because I have never used a table saw and they are intimidating to me. Like, the blade is just right there waiting for someone to fall on it.

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s honestly really impressive seeing the SawStop table saws stop. If I’m reading it right, they use capacitance to detect a body part and take advantage of the space below the table to let the blade fall into while braking it.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah the SawStop technology is really cool and it’s too bad that it’s held up by patents. In my case, because of budget and physical space constraints, the RAS turned out to be the right choice for me.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          I thought they announced they were making the patent public so other companies could make the blade stop mechanisms and hopefully save more lives/body parts

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Stumpy Nubs has released a video on this topic, which is what I’m mainly pulling from.

            Several of SawStop’s patents have expired but there is one still active which is fairly broad in scope and basically gives them right-of-way over any flesh-detecting saw brakes. They sued (or issued a cease and desist, don’t know if it went to court or whatever) Bosch for the line of flesh detecting saws they briefly sold. There is now some proposal for requiring all saws to have flesh-sensing blade brakes in the US, which would basically set the minimum price of a table saw at $1000 or more, and SawStop has “promised” to open their patent if this becomes law. For whatever that’s worth.

            It is my understanding that Underwriter’s Labs is where the requirement for any new model of table saw sold after 2008 have a riving knife.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Intimidated is good in this case but a table saw is not really any more dangerous than a radial arm saw. You also don’t have to worry about the blade riding up and grabbing the material. A good (cabinet saw or high end contractor) table saw is a very accurate and vesatile tool.

      A solid low cost option is a Craftsman 113 series which, with the right model (10 inch belt drive) and upgrades, is an excellent saw. There’s still a whole lot of them sitting around in garages collecting dust, ready to be picked up for less than a couple hundred bucks.