Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

    • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Explain why the real estate sector in a small island city-state is comparable in any way to that in the country with the second largest landmass in the world.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because 99% of the Canada landmass is rural, and a city is a city.

        Also, last time I checked, Montreal (the first city mentioned in the article) is an island.

        • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Singapore is 735.2 sq km and has a density of 7,804/sq km.

          The Montreal metropolitan area is 4,258.31 sq km and has a density of 1,007.85/sq km.

          I don’t know if 1% of Canada is urban. But assuming it is, and assuming that it is impossible to grow that 1% of the 9,093,507 sq km that make up the country (a ludicrous assumption that one), that is still 90,935.1 sq km.

          Your comparison is just plain irrelevant and wrong.

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Your comparison has no relevance. What does total available landmass have to do with anything related to the policies in question?

            • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Sorry but any analysis of real estate economics that does not take into account the scarcity or abundance of …land is just pointless.

              Singapore does not have a Brossard to connect with a REM to build a new urban core. Even more, it does not have multiple options for different places to develop and densify, like Montreal has, just based on the current plans for the REM, and without taking into account future transit projects or the idea of, oh I don’t know, creating an Ottawa-Montreal megacity with HSR.

              • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Again, what does having abundance of land have to do with policies like Walkability, Speculation, or Social housing?

                  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    You don’t improve walkability by spreading things out, you actually want the exact opposite.

                    Speculation is harder if there’s more of something available.

                    Social housing… I fail to see any connection to the amount of land in a country.