• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    The evidence isn’t even that strong, there i just aren’t that many people willing to risk becoming a pariah to dispute them.

    If you are a Christian, there is no doubt Jesus existed. Any oblique reference to a rabbi who was persecuted hundreds years ago is considered evidence that Jesus existed. But no contemporaneous documentation exists.

    If you’re not a Christian, debunking all of those vague references that might be proof of a Jewish leader named Jesus just isn’t particularly important, won’t persuade anyone who believes Jesus was(is) God, and will paint a target on your back for terrorists.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wait… you mean to tell me there’s not a collective of atheist Wikipedia writers that have dedicated their lives to the absence of religion and citing themselves on refuting evidence on Wikipedia?!?

      Wouldn’t it be weird of every Wikipedia article on the historical validity of Jesus was written by Christian scholars that have dedicated their lives to their religion? It would be wild if they were just citing themselves in these Wiki articles in order to sell some books, wouldn’t it?