• Veraticus@lib.lgbtM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s quite a gap between “we need to get rid of white men” and “white men have problems that need to be fixed!” Can’t we say the latter without saying the former?

    Why is the title stating I’m a climate denial super spreader?

    The funny thing when talking about any problem with white people, is that then you have two problems: the original problem, and also white fragility.

    We can talk about problems with whiteness and white people without indicting individuals, just as we can talk about problems with masculinity and men without indicting individuals. No one is coming to take your whiteness away or telling you you’re a bad person.

    Now, can we talk about the problems with white masculinity?

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh lay off the fragile masculinity/snowflake shit. We have feelings too. I’d like to see your take on an article called “Gay men are STI super spreaders” or “Blacks men end up in prison”. These two titles could both accompany thoughtful articles too, because underneath these vulgar headlines are genuine societal issues. I’m disappointed that a mod of this community of all people is telling me to just man up and suck up on the generalized man shaming.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The question is why do you feel targeted. I’m as white as it gets - and I don’t feel targeted by the headline, generalised or shamed in any way or form. I get that headlines have to be edgy - that is the game of klick based 24h news circle.

        • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel targeted because I’m lumped into the title’s generalization. I’ve read a bit about informal generalizations afterwards and I get now that I don’t have to interpret it as such. Such generalizations are not as universally shunned upon as I thought as long as they don’t devolve into stereotypes.

          As for clickbaity titles, of course it’s a thing but they’re counter productive so I’d rather call them out.

          (I really should let this thread be already.)

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbtM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the gay community was the primary community impacted by monkeypox, and I can say that without anger or judgment, for the purpose of fixing that problem in our community and targeting the people most affected by it. And for stopping it in the proper place.

        …just like the problems with white masculinity.

        I’m suggesting you dismiss your fragility and focus on the problems and improving them.