• sabreW4K3OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    valid criticisms

    Was? I saw someone say that Mozilla were implementing PPA so they could take a cut of all adverts that appear via the browser. It’s outrage for the sake of outrage. A bunch of people that run adblockers, whipping up a storm about something that doesn’t affect them, because God forbid an alternative to Chromium based browsers exist or some other stupid as shit idea. All hail the Internet purists. If it doesn’t benefit them directly, it has to be bad.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It is pretty much being forced on everyone. It is enabled by default and you need to know that you must disable it. It wasn’t asked for and doesn’t benefit me in the least. However, it is a privacy risk. I also don’t like it out of principle as I don’t like being manipulated (targeted advertising)

      • sabreW4K3OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is enabled by default and you need to know that you must disable it.

        This is funny because every other browser has a form of PPA or is straight exempting a bunch of ads. Mozilla are still committed to maintaining the protections of adblockers.