Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoCan I have a rule?files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1198arrow-down1imageCan I have a rule?files.catbox.moeRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresircac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoThere is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoOnly science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true. Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.