It just made my morning to see that not only is the AP reporting this correctly, but the headline explicitly states the insane rarity of voter fraud. (Non-citizen or otherwise.) You have a better chance of getting a clear picture of Bigfoot than you do of having a voter fraud incident in your jurisdiction.

  • LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re moving goalposts again, as I provided the excerpt from the article that you asked for in your prior comment.

    The truth of the matter is that each of the racially motivated hurdles to voting I’ve previously noted follow a clear pattern of aiming to prevent certain groups from voting and this latest one is no different. No fluctuation of strawman arguments will change that

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This article is referencing new bills that will disenfranchise legitimately registered voters

      No. This is what you stated. Instead of showing where any disenfranchisement would happen you quoted

      Some Democrats contend the measures could create hurdles for legal voters

      This is not evidence of any disenfranchisement is occurring Instead you’re just wildly speculating that there’s some random clear pattern of some sort that simply doesn’t exist.