https://archive.is/4Y4EC

This August, thousands of pro-Palestine protesters marched outside the Democratic National Convention carrying signs reading, among other slogans, ā€œAbandon Harris.ā€ The campaign, started by University of Minnesota Professor Hassan Abdel Salam, encourages voters to either abstain from voting in the presidential election or vote third-party, with many rallying around Jill Stein. The campaign has spread like wildfire across social media and the Twin Cities community.

I have spent the last year attending pro-Palestine actions, participating in boycotts and raising funds for the people of Gaza. I even voted ā€œuncommittedā€ in the primary. I donā€™t consider these actions particularly remarkable or expect to be praised for them, but I do hope that they provide me some credibility when I state that I believe voting for Harris is absolutely necessary.

The Abandon Harris movementā€™s stated purpose is, according to Salam, ā€œto punish her and the [Democratic] Partyā€ for funding the genocide in Gaza. My question is: And then what? Abandoning Harris can result in only one thing ā€” a second Trump presidency. While those advocating refusal to vote state very clearly that they donā€™t want Donald Trump to win, either, this is an issue of intent vs. impact. The simple facts of the two-party system dictate that suppressing votes for one candidate guarantees a larger percentage of votes for the opposing candidate. This is exactly why conservatives have spent decades trying to limit access to voting; itā€™s extremely alarming to see leftists doing voter supressionistsā€™ work for them.

(As an aside to anyone who believes Iā€™m unfairly dismissing the possibility of a Jill Stein presidency, I would like to point out that the most successful third-party candidate in U.S. history, Ross Perot, won only 18.9% of the popular vote. While I am eager for an end to the two-party system, this election has too much at stake to justify taking such an enormous risk.)

Letting Trump win will not stop the slaughter of Palestinians. In fact, Trump promises to deport pro-Palestine activists, which would decimate if not destroy the movement. A Trump presidency will not materially benefit Palestinians in any way. Activist campaigns that exist to assuage feelings of guilt, but do nothing to actually help people, are purely performance art. And while the Democratic establishment will certainly sting from losing the election, they will not truly suffer for it. Those who will suffer are the BIPOC, the LGBTQ+, the poor and all other marginalized communities that Trump persecutes ā€” the very people who have been fighting for Palestine.

Trumpā€™s platform calls for mass deportations; elimination of workerā€™s rights by deregulating industry; elimination of anti-discrimination protections, DEI initiatives and restricting discussion of systemic racism; limiting access to abortion; and attacking transgender peopleā€™s rights in every sector of life. This last point is especially urgent to me as a nonbinary transmasculine person, and as the partner of a transgender woman.

My partner has suffered from PTSD for years, and contrary to the conservative narrative, her transition did not cause that pain but has helped alleviate it. Since transitioning, the only time my partner ever attempted suicide was when she encountered a barrier in getting her estrogen. If a ban on gender-affirming care took away her estrogen permanently, she would not survive. I have considered suicide at the prospect of not being able to get top surgery. Our stories are not unique. For thousands of transgender people, access to gender-affirming care is a matter of life and death. Trump doesnā€™t just mean to infringe on our rights, he means to murder us. He means to commit genocide against trans people in addition to continuing the genocide against Palestinians.

Many on the left consider Trumpā€™s promises, and the conservative playbook Project 2025, to be empty threats. But if this assumption is wrong, innumerable marginalized people, who the left is supposed to be fighting for, will die. Itā€™s an incredibly dangerous gamble.

I have many questions for the Abandon Harris movement. Where is the practical infrastructure for the revolution you seek? How do you plan to rebuild decades of activist gains from scratch? Who will be there to fight for Palestine when so many of us are dead, jailed or deported? And are our lives worth punishing the Democrats?

Leo Rose Rodriguez lives in Minneapolis.

  • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    As a lefty anyone on the left who considers the 2025 playbook and trumps spewing as empty threats is either a plant or a clown. How is it empty threats if theyā€™ve already been doing a ton of the things they say theyā€™re gonna do.

  • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    Very well said.

    As someone that feels like I learned about emotions way too late and recently started trying to actually feel them and whatnot (mr supposedly logical over here), it really blows my mind how emotional people are being about such important things while thinking theyā€™re being rational and reasonable, all the while spending zero time to understand why others disagree with them

    This recipe sucks!

  • SoJB@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    I will be joining the authors effort in not letting Trump win with one simple trick. Voting socialist. Harris is not a socialist. Itā€™s that simple.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Are you saying youā€™re going to prevent Trump from winning by voting third party? That justā€¦ doesnā€™t work. It doesnā€™t matter if you want it to work, it factually does not. This is like stabbing someone and then saying ā€œbut I didnā€™t mean to murder them, I just wanted to stab them.ā€

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      A vote for a 3rd party is a vote that you wouldnā€™t particularly mind a second Trump presidency.