cmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down12
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comcmeerw@programming.dev to C++@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarekSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoI don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
minus-squareTamo240@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-212 hours ago The goal of this proposal is to advance a superset of C++ with a rigorously safe subset. The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.
I don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax
A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.