Element is launching the world’s first communications platform based on the upcoming Matrix 2.0 release. The result is blazing performance which outperforms the mainstream alternatives - across a decentralised system that enables self-hosting and end-to-end encryption - as well as open standard interoperability to revolutionise real time communication between large organisations.

Built on Matrix 2.0, Element X now rivals the performance of centralised consumer messaging apps, empowering organisations to address the shadow IT issues caused by consumer-grade messaging apps in the workplace.

The new Element communications solution consists:

  • Element X, our next-gen app with an array of new features
  • Element Call fully integrated into Element X, for native Matrix-encrypted voice and video
  • Element Server Suite, our backend hosting solution for powerful admin control and Matrix 2.0 performance
  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I had just uninstalled Element X like two weeks ago because I found it to under perform compared to the normal Element client on Android, in addition to lacking some features. I guess I’ll give it another shot.

    Update: WOW this thing feels lightning fast compared to just a few weeks ago. This is great. Not sure about feature completeness, but based on speed I think I’ll migrate Element > Element X again. Great job to the team!

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        that’s interesting. I had found it fast initially when it was first released. I didn’t use it often but when I finally stared using Matrix more often I was bouncing between both and Element X was significantly slower than normal Element so I decided to uninstall just a few weeks ago. I had even tried un/reinstalling to see if it would fix it, but it didn’t. Much happier with it now.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess it depends on the phone, but even if you didn’t notice it, it should be more efficient now with less resource usage (battery, ram)

  • Scio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Still no Spaces support. Even the short list of rooms I’ve joined are unmanageable when listed flat with no way to identify which Space a #general belongs to

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Native OIDC support…something I wish more self hosted apps would prioritize. I shouldn’t need to maintain a bunch of user account systems on my own servers.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Discord uses their own screen sharing implementation because it performs better than what’s available in Electron by default. I don’t expect Element to achieve that, considering their focus isn’t gaming.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yes, you can. The server code is on github. But I don’t know why you would, since all messages are encrypted client-side.

          Its more secure because you know that all your users can’t send a message unencrypted, either accidentally or intentionally.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            there’s a graphical indicator if they send something unencrypted, and there’s no way to turn an encrypted chat into an unencrypted chat on matrix. Plus they start encrypted by default, I honestly don’t even know how to make an unencrypted chat, I don’t think there’s any good way to other than using a client that doesn’t have encryption.

            this is not a real problem.

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              It is a problem. Many orgs have strict rules not to use messaging solutions that support unencrypted messages

              This doesn’t tick the box, so it blocks adoption

  • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m still sad they stopped work on dendrite. P2P level decentralization, with E2EE, would be amazing.

    These are still great improvements though. I’m hyped that loading seems to be so much faster.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What’s the difference between the normal app and element X? Why create a new app?

    EDIT: I installed it, but can’t verify for some reason.

    EDIT: It works now, and it’s very fast compared to the other client. It’s a shame spaces aren’t supported.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Normy here, I think it’s a whole different framework which is faster and more reliable I think. Also the normal app technology outdated so maybe it’s difficult to add new features to it.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I currently use Synapse with bridges to Signal and Discord, and Matrix API. Is Element X a better way to go server-side now?

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          No they don’t, it’s just confusingly worded

          Element X is a matrix client that will eventually replace Element for android/ios

          Matrix 2.0 is the server suite, some of the changes in matrix 2.0 are necessary for element x to work.

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Got it, thank you. So if I’m following now, Matrix 2.0 a new protocol, and the solution to run instead of synapse is Element Server and Element Call?

              • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Is that still the case?

                This level of integration means that group VoIP in Matrix finally benefits from all of Matrix’s native end-to-end encryption, cryptographic identity and decentralisation - no longer handing over to a third-party system such as Jitsi which doesn’t integrate with Matrix’s encryption guarantees.

                And, native E2EE for voice and video (through the Element Call integration mentioned above) ensures that Matrix’s encryption guarantees now extend to video conferencing.

                Though I’m assuming you mean protocols not app names.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think it’s actually Element X, Element Call and Element Server Suite, and they just did not want to write Element 3 times

        • kudos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, that’s your reading comprehension. You are conflating Matrix 2.0 and Element X.

  • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    All I read is Marketing Tech Speak that sounds no different than anything else that gets advertised in my face. At work, we use Teams. It is a pain sometimes when it gets a little buggy, but integrates into SharePoint/OneDrive and the noise suppression in meetings is pretty awesome. At home I use discord or GChat because that is where all my friends are. I don’t assume I have privacy on any of these platforms and they all work on my phone and computer.

    How is the user experience? Ultimately, give me privacy, but if the user experience and UI don’t give any improvements over the corporate ones, I will have to try it some other time.

      • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        But my question is about the user experience and UI. I can run a docker script, but I care about the thing I can see and interact with.

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The user experience is generally worse than Discord, like any federated system compared to centralized platforms.

          There is Cinny, a client with an UI similar to Discord. Element X is a great mobile client, and imo far superior to Discord for 1 on 1 chats (to be fair, I really dislike Discord 1 on 1 chat experience, so I’m biased).

          Edit: It’s worth noting that Element X does not support Spaces yet, which allows for grouping of rooms similar to Discord Server.

          • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Thank you for answering the question! I am genuinely both trying to make a point and still be open to try new things. To me, there seems to be a real downward turn on UI/UX in a lot of applications these days, corporate included. When they mentioned the bit about supporting corporate, I have a hard time believing they will get very far with that customer group right now.

            I really wish software, especially FOSS, would stop making the UI the afterthought. I try to keep a holistic view when designing things and everyone has a seat at the table. I wonder if projects are boxing themselves in and making it harder for the UI teams to properly integrate, and vice versa? I will happily take criticism and ideas from pretty much anyone, especially outside my immediate teams.

            I am pretty out of the game on that as I spent quite a few years doing controls engineering instead. I am back in Software now and I feel old and a little lost. I graduated back in 2012 and we didn’t have all of these crazy developer roles and more specialized degrees. They were trying to get a Game Design program started when I graduated, and it was supposedly a mess for a few years.

            • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I also think the Element Web UI is lacking, but it’s gotten better over the last few years, after they started taking design more seriously. With Element X they do proper UI/UX design as a first step, and then implement it.

              The old Riot.im client was exceptionally terrible, in performance and design, so I’m really happy with Element X.

              Element being focused on corporate needs is nothing new, since they’ve a few large (government, healthcare) contracts, and they’ve struggled with financing for years now. Big deployments using Synapse is the big reason dendrite doesn’t see much development anymore, even though it was planned as a replacement for Synapse at first.

              I believe many of their side projects (P2P, VR) exist because they try to find possible business avenues, although I feel like most of them aren’t successful (and they stretch to thin because of that).

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Unencrypted messages are useful for very large rooms, where encryption doesn’t provide meaningful more privacy since public rooms have to be considered public space anyway. Encryption does have overhead, so it makes sense to disable it.

      Private rooms are E2EE by default and can’t be created unencrypted (at least in the Element X mobile UI). This is a good way to handle it IMO.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Encryption is, what, a 10% hit? I (and most companies) would gladly take that tax to ensure that it wasn’t possible for me or anyone in my org to accidentally send an unencrypted message.

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          10% of what? keys are regularly rotated, per-member, and it would soon cost a lot of storage to store historical keys for very large rooms (by their member count)

          • delirious_owl@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sounds like a design flaw. How does this work with other messengers that don’t allow users to send unencrypted messages, like Wire, Signal, and WhatsApp?

  • azron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “invisible cryptography” I sure hope this isn’t an empty promise. The number one gripe I have with matrix/element is the absolutely horrendous crypto dance they make you do.

    • Rexios@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      What are you talking about? Even before this new “invisible cryptography” you set it up once per device and never have to think about it again.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s probably the number one reason I can’t convince friends to move over, I know they would bawk at how it makes them do that on every device

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I studied cryptography and I can’t figure out how to do the dance right. I thought I did, but one of my contacts says they can’t read any message I send them. And I can’t message them to figure out why.

        We haven’t spoken since. Thanks Matrix.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        while I agree that there are too many problems right now, 2 things really can’t be avoided:

        • setting up key backup after registration asap
        • verifying your new logged in devices, possibly with the key backup password

        well, unless they are fine with using it like signal, which is basically one device only

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            (part 2) technically, though, the other part of it is still the case: if you haven’t set yo key backup and you lost your phone, don’t be surprised if you can’t recover all your messages

            • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Not really, have used it for years like that. But you need to set it up initially on your phone. The newish feature (less than a year) is that I think they do not require a phone number to set up a new account.

              • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The newish feature (less than a year) is that I think they do not require a phone number to set up a new account.

                How do you do that? A few days ago I have registered again, and I didn’t see the option. Didn’t you perhaps mean that the app can hide phone numbers?