US presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would appoint Elon Musk to head a government efficiency commission if he is elected to office in November.

“At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement… I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” Trump told the Economic Club of New York.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Translation: “I got an endorsement and a lot of money from Elon Musk, so I’m giving him a government job as a kickback where he can “regulate” his own businesses to enrich himself even further at the expense of literally every other American.”

    Oh man, I can’t see a conflict of interest at all. Nope, no siree.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Dear Donald J. Numbskull: the fact that Elon never sleeps and kisses your ass does not mean he’s efficient, or even understands the concept.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think hiring the CEO of MULTIPLE Businesses who bought a WEBSITE for $44000000000 and has MULTIPLE Government Contracts to a Government Role is a BIGLY SMART Move with LITERALLY no Downside or room for Swampy Activity!

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He’s good at promising without delivering, which is great if your idea of government efficiency is “have the best press while embezzling tons of money”.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Which is the safest thing to do since he has name recognition…

      Source: I worked in a contracting office and literally these words have been spoken by almost every contracting official.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean, depending on what your goals are, that could very well be described as efficient.

      Like, if your goal is to destroy the American government, could anyone do it more efficiently than Elmo?

  • NegativeNull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He just wants to be able to shut down the FAA, who keeps enforcing rules he doesn’t like (and SpaceX keeps breaking)

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Musk is CEO of 3 companies and has the time for a Government job?

    Being CEO is a part time job.

  • Burninator05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not that it matters to his supporters buy he litterally said that he can be bought for a couple of pretty words.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve been saying for a few years now that I don’t blame anyone anymore for biting the onion. It is FAR TOO HARD to figure out what is life being absurd, and what is an absurd satire headline.

      The lines aren’t blurred anymore. There are no lines. The lines have ceased to exist at this point.

      I don’t understand life anymore, and I’d like to go back to politics being boring instead of being a circus.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And that’s assuming the headline you’re reading even has any bearing on the actual article, or that the article itself is factual, both of which are increasingly more common worries now.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m getting really sick of the “conventional wisdom” that government is inefficient and wasteful when compared to private industry. Medicare for example can provide more healthcare per dollar than any private insurer despite subsidizing that industry.

    Profit and marketing are inefficiencies because they add cost but no value.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yep, exactly. Also, look at how the USPS works.

      Republican chuds: “Big Guvmit can’t do anything right, it’s the worst, they are hurting my freedom, argle bargle!”

      Also Republican chuds: “Back the blue (unless they break up a terrorist action called in by our former failed president) and our military is the bestest and shiniest in the whole wide WURLD!”

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Government is inefficient if you elect people who believe it is and set out to prove it.

      People who say “run things like a business” don’t know shit. Every job I’ve worked at has had tremendous waste, but no one was looking closely because it’s private.

      Like, right wing nut jobs would lose their shit if they learned a government office was buying fresh fruits for workers but most of it was going bad and being thrown out. But that happened every day for a while.

      There’s also been a lot of “why is this machine still running? How much are we paying AWS for this??”

      There’s also been a lot of "we don’t need to do accessibility on our website because most of our customers don’t care, and no one’s making us ".

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And the whole reason the department is being created is because it would be called DOGE