• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    Conceptually I think this is great.

    But… How many folk are now eligible to be recalled to active duty?

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      If anyone becomes eligible for recall due to this discharge upgrade, it’d be a very small number and even then, there’s next to no chance that they’d actually get called up. Can’t rule it out entirely because something about a Sith and absolutes (and because I don’t care to dig into the statistics) but realistically, it won’t happen.

      10 U.S.C. § 688 (Retired members: authority to order to active duty; duties)

      …a member described in subsection (b) may be ordered to active duty by the Secretary of the military department concerned at any time.

      (b) Covered Members.-Except as provided in subsection (d), subsection (a) applies to the following members of the armed forces:

      (1) A retired member of the Regular Army, Regular Navy, Regular Air Force, or Regular Marine Corps.

      (2) A member of the Retired Reserve who was retired under section 1293, 7311, 7314, 8323, 9311, or 9314 of this title.

      (3) A member of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve.

      (4) A retired member of the Space Force.

      This section states that retirees of armed forces branches and reservists may be recalled to active duty. The thing about subsection (d) refers to a program where officers could choose to retire early so doesn’t really come into play for what we’re talking about. It’s worth noting that a service member who completes their contract is not necessarily a retiree which is why the recall authority doesn’t apply more broadly.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’m not aware of any mechanism to recall any former enlisted servicemember past their IRR period.

        • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I figure if things get bad enough that they’d want any of us fat, broken old(ish)-timers back, we’ll see some new laws on the books making it possible.

          • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bruh, if I got out and fulfilled my IRR honorably and whatnot, and then I was recalled years later, I would promptly smoke all the pot in reasonable distance from me the moment I received that recall notice.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m sure the existing draft covers it, but we’d be a long way down the list.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            DADT ended in 2011. The military would have to be pretty desperate to want most of those veterans back in service.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not how it works. To be recalled you have to still be in the irr. To be in the irr you have to re-enlist. You can’t re-enlist if you’re discharged for dadt. If they still qualify for irr they could of course sign a new contract but that’d be entirely their decision.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh shit, that’s interesting. I just rolled irr when I got out. I didn’t have to do anything.