• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My Fairphone 3 already has replaceable batteries. What is really missing is an industry-standard form factor, like ATX/ITX exists for desktops.

    If there were a standard, we’d be able to upgrade the components as needed. We wouldn’t be forced to waste perfectly good displays just because we would like to upgrade the CPU. Companies wouldn’t be pushing for new upgrades every year. Apple/Samsung wouldn’t be able to hold their dominance because it would be easier for smaller players to specialize in specific components. The entire maker community wouldn’t have to be fighting over Raspberry PI and we could even have a cottage industry around upcycled consumer electronics.

    • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be quite utopian, however I feel such a thing would be incredible hard to achieve. Different form factors require different layouts, space is much tighter and should not be wasted. In desktop PC land, you have plenty of room to fit things as you want.
      It may not be showstopper, but it’s certainly a challenge. And of course, companies won’t like it :P

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like the opposite: the constraints are so well-known and so well defined that most phones end up looking the same anyway, we might as well just take one of them (any of them!) and make it a standard.

        companies won’t like it

        Apple/Samsung surely won’t. But I’d bet that the smaller ones would like to have some type of level-playing field. Also, imagine the amount of startups that could come up in the space.

        • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          mm you bring good points! hadn’t thought of how it would level the playing field

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the first time I hear about Fairphone. How they embrace repairability is amazing. I hope they’ll expand to North America at one point.

    • nudl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had this thought in the past, but upon further research, on a smartphone scale it runs into a few issues.

      A PC has relatively divorced components because it has the space to accommodate slots, but that already goes out the window for laptops; the best you get is RAM and maybe MXM. People generally want slimmer and more battery-dense products, so motherboards with everything soldered can manage to be absolutely tiny (see: newer macbooks) compared to ones where everything is slotted. Newer smartphones don’t just last longer on battery because they’re bigger; much of the internal volume of a smartphone is now to hold the battery as everything around it shrinks. Modular connectors cost volume and money, for a use case where both are at a premium; most people would generally rather buy a non-modular phone that gets better battery life and offers better water resistance.

      As evidenced by the Note 7, batteries also need a decent bit of structural integrity around them to be safe, and the best way to accomplish that is just a 2-part box that’s been glued together. This has the side effect of making water resistance easier and slimming the phone down. Any swappable battery inherently has worse water resistance and volumetric efficiency than a pouch csll in a glued box, and manufacturers value both good battery life and things not blowing up.

      Smartphone CPUs (or rather SoCs) contain not only the CPU bit, but important parts of the radio, camera processing, location processing, and GPU. Therefore Android ones come with driver packs from manufacturers that make it all work, but if you’re swapping components around you need to make sure your sensors like cameras have a way to install drivers (and a general compatibility standard); which means at best you’re swapping pretty big chunks of a smartphone at a time.

      Even without forced obsolescence, smartphones have a relatively fixed lifespan of ~5-8 years due to software upgrades, how carriers buy up new radio frequencies, physical damage, battery degradation, vibration motor wear, camera focusing mechanism wear (from vibrations) and in the case of AMOLED display wear. This isn’t a knock on standardization, but you can already achieve this lifespan out of a smartphone if you use something like Advanced Charging Controller to limit battery charge to 80%.

      If you look at Project Ara (which is the most extreme case of modularity), it failed because of all of the above. The battery life, structural integrity, cost efficiency, compatibility, and waterproofness would all be awful compared to a standard phone.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People generally want slimmer and more battery-dense products

        I call BS on that one. People say they want slim electronics and the first thing they do is to slap it in a protective case. It’s like SUVs and light trucks in the USA. People don’t even have the choice anymore because smaller cars are not as profitable, so then Ford goes to sell one gazillion F150s to soccer moms and then they claim “we are just fulfilling the demand of the market”.

        My Fairphone seems bulky in comparison (and it is), but it is small enough that I can have it in my pocket.

        (laptops) the best you get is RAM and maybe MXM

        Is it really? With things like M2 slots you can get separate wifi adapters, fast storage. With Thunderbolt, we don’t even need a high-end graphics card in the laptop. We can do plenty with an iGPU and have an external, upgradeable GPU for those that want to game or do heavy work.

        which means at best you’re swapping pretty big chunks of a smartphone at a time.

        Fine by me. If we break down as CPU/storage/camera module/“everything else board”, then it’s 4 modules. Which is a lot more than what we are getting now and it’s the complete opposite of what manufacturers are giving us.

  • userdata0@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So there’s going to be a catch here and I’m curious how it will work out. Integrating the battery directly into the phone without it being easily removable is going to mean less capacity since the battery will need a heavier-duty shell since you can’t rely on the phone itself for protection. I get the e-waste angle but generally I wouldn’t keep a phone past the end of updates anyways, and usually battery life is still acceptable at 4 years with good practices (not charging to 100% and holding it there overnight, etc).

    • DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My last two phones both got slow as their batteries got bad, and were basically like new after replacing them. My current phone doesn’t allow swapping the batteries.

      For someone thrifty, being able to replace the battery can extend a phone’s life 2x or more. Even if you don’t want to keep using it, you could still resell it or give it to someone who doesn’t need the newest phones. Non-swappable batteries are a form of planned obsolescence, in addition to just being more compact and probably a little cheaper.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had my current phone for around 5 years. I’m on the latest LineageOS. I have no speed issues. The battery is starting to show signs of age. My previous phone had a longer life and got through two batteries. It was up to date with LineageOS until it’s last days. It was lack of RAM that did it in. My current phone still has mid level amount of RAM.

      EU needs to look at updatablity next. If the vendors no longer provides real updates, they should unlock the bootloader. Really I want phones to like PCs and not require a custom OS each…

  • Ben@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being able to have a spare battery in case of emergency (or simply app train/bus tickets) is going to be nice. It’s going go be exciting to see how apple will try to circumvent this.

  • chamim@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we reached a point where flagship phones are good enough to be used for more than 5 years. But the battery won’t live that long, for. most people. I’ve replaced my previous phone, after four years of using it, for the most part because of the battery. I’m looking forward to replaceable batteries returning and helping at least some of us keep our phones for a few more years.

  • keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Had to replace my previous phone due to bad battery.

    Kept it safe, used cover and screen protection, but the battery got so bad it was not mobile anymore.

    Now? Now all the complexity that went into making the phone is e-waste, what a shame.

    • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! It bums me so much that the vast majority of the money you spent buying the device and of the money spent making the device is completely thrown out because you can’t replace a little component that was perfectly replaceable 10 years ago… 🙄

  • Fraeco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given the state of technology the battery decaying wasn’t the issue in my latest phones. It was performance of the device. Apps keep evolving and at some point your device just can’t keep up anymore.

    Went from a Moto g6 I think to a Pixel3 and now a pixel 6 pro. Batteries can be charged everywhere, CPU’s can’t be overclock without limits.

    • teri@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Going from Google-Android to LineageOS boosted the battery life of my old Smartphone by a factor 3 roughly. There where some Google-things consuming battery in the background, probably spying on me. Also using simple Apps from F-Droid helps to get a smooth experience.

    • teri@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In general, that’s definitely a problem too. Just look at Windows 11. Now M$ wants you to buy a new laptop such that their OS can run at all. I use a >10y old laptop with Linux. No performance issues for everyday use.

  • binboupan@lemmy.kagura.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always wondered if there is a physical limitation why the battery couldn’t go in like a sim card? Just a slot where it goes in. I’m curious how this all will work out.

    • bric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      LG had some phones like that in 2016ish, on the G5 the entire bottom of the phone slid out to reveal a big battery slot and on the V20 there was a button that let the metal back of the phone pop off so you could change the battery. I had an external battery charger and a couple of spare batteries for my V20, so I could just pack spare batteries and swap them whenever it got low. I never even bothered to plug my phone in, it was always just faster to pop in a battery that was already fully charged. It didn’t have any water resistance, but it was a pretty small price to pay for endless battery life

      It’s a shame that LG’s whole phone division went under, because they were making some of the coolest phones that came out that whole decade

    • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see an issue, but perhaps nobody ever thought to really try shipping a device with something like that. Specially since the water proofing advent.

    • Felix Urbasik@ma.fellr.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @binboupan @tmpod I’d say it’s simply space. To make modern smartphones have enough power for the day, the battery has to be as large as possible. Generally, it’s sandwiched directly between the screen and the backcover.

      The reason they’re not removeable anymore is because this way manufacturers don’t need to put the battery in a plastic casing, leaving more space for energy.

      I mean, you could also just make the smartphones bigger, but people want them as flat as possible.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now it seems Apple will need to figure out how to allow access to the battery inside future iPhones, as will every other smartphone manufacturer.

    There’s nothing to figure out. All manufacturers have already used removable batteries in the past. Just blow the dust off the old designs and adapt them!

    • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They sure will fight it. The main counter-argument I see is water proofing, but I believe I’ve seen a phone with good proofing but still accessible. Don’t remember the brand and model though.

      • ____@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Samsung Galaxy S5 was a good example of this. The back panel and battery was removable, and the charging port had an extra plastic cover that went on top to protect against water ingress

        • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dang, looking at those phones from back then, they were such good designs. Simple yet effective.

    • 2d@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There will be a lot to figure out. The new designs provide features that the old ones couldn’t- and there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

      • kestrel7@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

        I gotta gently push back against this. You may not know them personally, but there are a LOT of people who have gone back to dumbphones over this. IMO, this is a large part of why dumbphone sales are catching up on smartphone sales for the first time in years. I even know some elderly folks who stopped using cell phones entirely when smartphones stopped having replaceable batteries (easier going back to having a landline when one is retired/not raising kids, of course).

        There are very few people who buy the currently existing smartphones who would prioritize this feature, yes – because anyone who does prioritize this feature has been excluded from the entire smartphone market for several years now.

      • arandomthought@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s extremely hard to tell what people would prioritize. If you aks them hypothetically, everyone probably is some green warrior for mother earth. But then when push comes to shove, the industry will give them the choice between a flagship phone, glued all around, and a phone with a removable battery with all the greatest specs from five years ago. Of course many will chose the glued one, and then some people will be like “welp, the free market has decided”. 🤷

        edit: typo

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          greatest specs from five years ago. Of course many will chose the glued ond, and then some people will be like “welp, the free market has decided”. 🤷

          This whole practice infuriates me to no end. The market has never truly been given a choice in any of these changes since every phone worth buying has copied the others (removing headphone jack, replaceable batteries, SD card slot, no charger, etc) all around the same time. Never stops sycophants from telling the rest of us that nobody wants these features ‘becuz da market sayz so.’

  • Enitoni@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Say what you want about the EU, but at least they keep greedy companies in check as much as they can.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The other thing that seems to fail is USB-C connector. I wonder if the USB-C connectors in most phones last beyond 5 years. Mine still works but I cannot plug the device in and use it without it just falling out pretty quickly. The old micro USB plugs seem a little more robust.

    • Pigeon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is dramatically the opposite of my experience. I’ve never had a usb-c port die, but the microUSB ports were fragile as heck.

      I’ve had cheapo USB-C cables die but that’s because cheap.

      • flatbield@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you have a specific cable brand that might be better? I have tried multiple suppliers. Same.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Anker is my go to and handles my kids cable abuse pretty well. I also echo the above person’s comment that USB-C has been way more robust than micro for me.

  • Oliver@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well… for iPhones (and other smartphones) I’m not sure if anything changes. There is a exception in the regulation: if the device is waterproof, it is enough if the manufacturer or repair shops can change the battery for you. They do not need to be user replaceable.

    But probably for MacBooks, there will be replaceable batteries in the future. I don’t see, how Apple will find a way around this regulation.

    Apple Watch: they are waterproof —> nothing changes.

    AirPods: well… are they waterproof? I don’t see user changeable batteries ever. Perhaps they will become waterproof in the future too? :) AirPods, now also for swimming and diving!

    iPads: well: probably there will be changeable batteries in the future. Or we will have underwater Tablets soon. We just need another input method. Probably gestures like the VisionPro?

    • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is “water proof” defined in the legislation? Apple carefully says their devices are water resistant. There is a possibility that it will not qualify.

    • RichByy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not just Apple. Almost all manufacturers offer water resistant flagship phones (and mid-rangers). ASUS, Xiaomi, Oppo, Huawei, Sony, Samsung, Vivo, Honor…

      However, the phones are NOT water-proof. From none of these (neither Apple). They are water-resistant, which is a big difference and they are just required to not be damaged if submerged underwater for 30 minutes, 1.5m, if they want IP68.

      Phones and smartwatches are not resistant to condensation or water getting in – water can still get in, as they’re NOT impervious (smartwatches if they have speakers), which is actually required for calling your device truly “water proof”. Water resistant is literally two steps below that.

      There has been some marketing claiming water proof devices. This was just wrong.

      • Oliver@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting. Apple itself says, „Apple Watch Ultra has a water-resistance rating of 100 meters“.

        If even being officially able to dive until 40m and use the Ultra as a dive computer, doesn’t make it waterproof but just water-resistant?

        What does it need to be waterproof? Being able to dive down the Marianne Trench?