• Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now it seems Apple will need to figure out how to allow access to the battery inside future iPhones, as will every other smartphone manufacturer.

    There’s nothing to figure out. All manufacturers have already used removable batteries in the past. Just blow the dust off the old designs and adapt them!

    • 2d@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There will be a lot to figure out. The new designs provide features that the old ones couldn’t- and there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

      • arandomthought@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s extremely hard to tell what people would prioritize. If you aks them hypothetically, everyone probably is some green warrior for mother earth. But then when push comes to shove, the industry will give them the choice between a flagship phone, glued all around, and a phone with a removable battery with all the greatest specs from five years ago. Of course many will chose the glued one, and then some people will be like “welp, the free market has decided”. 🤷

        edit: typo

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          greatest specs from five years ago. Of course many will chose the glued ond, and then some people will be like “welp, the free market has decided”. 🤷

          This whole practice infuriates me to no end. The market has never truly been given a choice in any of these changes since every phone worth buying has copied the others (removing headphone jack, replaceable batteries, SD card slot, no charger, etc) all around the same time. Never stops sycophants from telling the rest of us that nobody wants these features ‘becuz da market sayz so.’

      • kestrel7@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

        I gotta gently push back against this. You may not know them personally, but there are a LOT of people who have gone back to dumbphones over this. IMO, this is a large part of why dumbphone sales are catching up on smartphone sales for the first time in years. I even know some elderly folks who stopped using cell phones entirely when smartphones stopped having replaceable batteries (easier going back to having a landline when one is retired/not raising kids, of course).

        There are very few people who buy the currently existing smartphones who would prioritize this feature, yes – because anyone who does prioritize this feature has been excluded from the entire smartphone market for several years now.

    • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They sure will fight it. The main counter-argument I see is water proofing, but I believe I’ve seen a phone with good proofing but still accessible. Don’t remember the brand and model though.

      • ____@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Samsung Galaxy S5 was a good example of this. The back panel and battery was removable, and the charging port had an extra plastic cover that went on top to protect against water ingress

        • tmpod@lemmy.ptOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dang, looking at those phones from back then, they were such good designs. Simple yet effective.