asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1506arrow-down16 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1500arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square104fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareschizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·14 hours agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-squarehumorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·10 hours agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).