• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    The practical application isn’t the proof that 1+1=2. That’s just a side-effect. The application was building a framework for proving mathematical statements. At the time the principia were written, Maths wasn’t nearly as grounded in demonstrable facts and reason as it is today. Even though the principia failed (for reasons to be developed some 30 years later), the idea that every proposition should be proven from as few and as simple axioms as possible prevailed.

    Now if you’re asking: Why should we prove math? Then the answer is: All of physics.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      The answer to the last question is even simpler and broader than that. Math should be proven because all of science should be proven. That is what separates modern science from delusion and self-deception