• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Even if you charge an EV on electricity generated from coal, it’s still cleaner over its lifetime.

    (Shock! Running one large generator constantly at the peak of its efficiency curve is more efficient than tens of thousands of tiny engines from a cold start, with varying levels of proper maintenance, all over their rev-range).

    About 5 years ago, two (peer reviewed) UK studies found that EVs typically overtake ICE vehicles after only around 2 years of ownership. The UK grid is cleaner now so it will now be an even shorter timeframe.

    I have an MX-5 that I drive on weekends, and care for dearly, it burns petrol, and I plan to keep this car literally for the rest of my life, because I love driving it. But fuck me am I fucking tired of the FUD surrounding EVs.

    Stop spreading disinformation and do some bloody research. Do better.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ahat about lithium production? Do you know much heavily contaminated water that leaves behind?

      I don’t have an ICE car, by the way. Nor will I buy one.

      • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The basic fact is that mining sucks and cars (or for that matter, most other technical products) are not environmentally friendly. However, the scale of these issues varies for different products. And to the point of scale:

        Yearly consumption of fossil fuels vs. Yearly amount of materials for green transition

        I’ll admit, the specifics and the source on this infographic are “trust me bro” because I forgot where I screenshotted it from. The takeaway is this, though: The necessary level of materials mining for electrified products and green energy does not compare to the level of fossil fuels drilling needed otherwise. In addition, battery materials can be recycled pretty well, so you only need to mine them once. Fossil fuels can not be recycled.

        In any case, it’s a good idea to question where all of the things you own and consume come from. It’s a good thing to fight for supply-chain laws. However, detractors of green energies systematically exaggerate environmental impacts precisely because the technologies they propose are massively dirtier.

        As to lithium in particular: Lithium from South America indeed has large environmental ramifications. However, most lithium is in fact mined in Australia in a completely different process.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you conceding that you were indeed making shit up in your previous comment?

        Ahat about lithium production?

        Nowhere near as bad as what goes on with fossil fuel production.

        I don’t have an ICE car, by the way. Nor will I buy one.

        Ok?

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            No, making shit up is making shit up.

            I’m being terse with you because you’re spreading disinformation about EVs that was thoroughly debunked years ago.

            Then, when corrected, you’re just jumping to the next piece of disinformation.