• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Don’t kid yourself… Project 2025 section on transportation suggests removing nearly all federal funding to alternative transport modes in place of state by state funding, and the only thing that 95% of State DoTs know how to do is build and widen roads.

    Page 621:

    If funding must be federal, it would be more efficient for the U.S. Congress to send transportation grants to each of the 50 states and allow each state to purchase the transportation services that it thinks are best. Such an approach would enable states to prioritize different types of transportation according to the needs of their citizens. States that rely more on automotive transportation, for example, could use their funding to meet those needs.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Implying cars will be affordable after tariffs. Cars from the past ten years are unreliable as hell. Everything before that is getting ran into the ground. Most people are priced out of the new car market.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If there’s no alternative transport, people will be forced to buy cars at any price, preferably with a predatory loan. I don’t think making cars more expensive is going to have the effect of making everyone cyclists if there’s no investment in infrastructure to enable this.