Crossposting here as I consider X a threat to both privacy and freedom

  • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    As much as I hate X, I might have to think about this one for a while. Sure, this platform is a vessel for fascist propaganda and a threat to democracy, but on the other hand, creating a legitimate precedent for banning a social network on political grounds might be a slippery slope. The EU has already made dubious reforms regarding internet freedom, like their antiterrorist bill which require website hosts to remove content whithin an hour if it is signaled to them by the police. I’m not sure if giving them more power and legitimacy in policing online content is a good idea…

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Shutting down a nontheoretical fascist breeding ground VS. a theoretical slide to 1984.

      Isn’t this the lesser evilism I was fed for the last year? Isn’t this the trolley problem? This should be easy for the American left to get behind.

      Instead its “okay a little fascism is okay, as a treat” and its odd to me.

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you don’t censor hate speech and allow malicious propaganda to be the default, is there really any value in letting it be accessible?

      The problem really is that the lenders of X’s debt probably have a significant influence and have a vested interest in recouping their money.

      • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t believe there is any value in X. In fact I’d say it has negative value. However, granting the UE power and legitimacy to censor any website for political reason also has a negative value, and I’m not certain which is lower.