Currently, Google pays Firefox’s bill by having them set their default search engine to Google.

This will no longer be when Chrome is in the hands of another party. DOJ is currently advocating for this forced sellout.

So will Firefox be no more after that?

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It doesn’t even earn any money.

    Neither do the rotisserie chickens at the store. Or Costco’s $1.50 hot dog and soda combo.

    Chrome isn’t intended to make money, it’s a loss leader.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a side point, but the costco hotdogs do absolutely turn a profit. $1.50 seems unreasonably low because of how much we’re used to paying for food these days, but its hotdogs and a fountain drink, the cost of ingredients is next to nothing.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Sorry, you’re correct - I should have said they do not make a loss on the sales (turn a profit is obviously a bit of a stretch) since they use their existing infrastructure to offset the operational expenses, and the actual ingredient cost is literally pennies per unit.

          • Num10ck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            costco’s business model is to sell everything at cost and only profit from subscriptions. hence the name.

          • Yeah, and that’s exactly what a “loss leader” is defined by. They make no profit off the hotdog combo itself but the hotdog combo may be enough of an incentive for someone to come to Coscto in the first place and end up buying more shit that does make a profit.