You think the US government canāt do that if they want to? We have the technology. And the man power. And the ability to print money. What is the hold up?
Do as many as you can. But the US is capable of doing that with the time left. Weāre choosing not to.
Because 90% of 150,000 is still 135,000 individuals. How thorough do you want each of those ācase by caseā checks to be?
https://www.bop.gov/mobile/about/population_statistics.jsp
If you want a blanket pardon for everyone with just a possession of marijuana charge thatās cool. But itās not what the letter is asking for.
You think the US government canāt do that if they want to? We have the technology. And the man power. And the ability to print money. What is the hold up?
Do as many as you can. But the US is capable of doing that with the time left. Weāre choosing not to.
You realize the money printing department and the releasing people from prison department arenāt the same, right?
Having a lot of people and having a lot of people qualified to individually examine 135k federal cases are two different things.
You say it can be done, I disagree. It doesnāt seem like thereās much more to be said.
Iām trying to guess what your reason for thinking the US canāt do something is because you wont say.
There are plenty of qualified people.
Why do you disagree?
Regardless, in case you didnāt know, the US can do this. There is no reason we canāt and your argument doesnāt provide any. edit: typo