The award for shadiest behind-the-scenes drama of the year will surely be awarded to Joaquin Phoenix bailing on Todd Haynes’ latest film days before shooting was about to start. As the story goes, Phoenix actually brought the story to Haynes, and then the pair collaborated (with co-writer Jon Raymond) on the script. It was meant to be an NC-17 gay love story set in 1930s Los Angeles, co-starring Danny Ramirez. But the film was greenlit based on an Oscar-caliber star like Phoenix at the top of the callsheet, so when he dropped out, it all fell apart. Four months later, Haynes made his first comment on the subject.

“What happened this summer was tough,” Haynes said when asked by Variety at the Marrakech Film Festival. (By the way, the moderator apparently announced at the beginning of the conversation that Haynes wasn’t going to comment on this subject. Naughty Variety!) “But the film itself and the script itself may resurrect in

Earlier this year Phoenix declined to comment on the reasons for his departure, but we’ve since learned that he gets cold feet about pretty much every time he ever makes a movie. That doesn’t make it any less of a jerk move to drop out on short notice, leaving the rest of the cast and crew in the lurch. Ramirez said the situation was “definitely disappointing.” And producer Christine Vachon declared that “The idea that [Haynes’] time was wasted and a movie is not the result of all that time working with Joaquin is a tragedy to me.” Hopefully she can take solace that the result may be resurrected someday!

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 days ago

    Sounds like Joaquin Phoenix is a liability. If the film gets funding because he’s involved but he could drop out at the last minute (they were building sets) then that is a problem.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Seems like movies should be made because they’re good and not because a certain celebrity is in it.

      • Gamma@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Correct, but celebs bring buzz and provide some upfront marketing. You can have the best movie ever made, but if nobody sees it then what’s the point (as far as getting people paid goes)

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Sometimes they’re even famous because they’re good at acting and will bring the quality of the movie way up as well (emphasis sometimes).