To put it as plainly as possible, if the proponents of the U.S. settler-colonialism theory are correct, then there is no basis whatsoever upon which to build a multinational working class communist party in this country. Indeed, such a view sees the “settler working class” as instruments of colonialism, hostile to the interests of the colonized people, rather than viewing all working and oppressed people as natural allies in the struggle against imperialism, our mutual oppressor.

A shame, a sad sad shame. For anyone that’s read settlers, or knows about the history of labor zionism, or prioritizes any kind of indigenous voice in their praxis, this is really bad. No peace for settlers! Settlers cannot lead the revolution! I hope we see an end to any respect given to this “settler colonialism is over” politic soon.

  • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even the American liberals realise that vast differences exist in the wealth of the different races in America that are the direct result of explicit discrimination that existed just 2-3 generations ago and implicit discrimination that still exists today. The existence of a settler class in America is undeniable.

    Finding out which individual belongs to which class is one the other, almost always a pointless endeavour since classes are an emergent phenomena in groups of people.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Again, you are conflating race and settlerism. The US is a white supremacist state, but you are using settler and race interchangeably.

      Who is a settler?

      • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Again, you are conflating race and settlerism

        Race is entirely a product of settlerism in the first place.

        Who is a settler?

        The settler class as a whole inherited humongous amounts of real estate wealth (which then exploded exponentially further under neoliberalism) and live in the more developed neighbourhoods of the country.

        Think of suburban single family homeowners. These people are settlers in the truest sense of the word. They are the urbanised version of the settler yeoman farmer. They use more land, water and energy than basically any non-bourgeois class on earth, and by a long shot.

        Their lifestyle and luxury is fueled by government subsidies (distributed on a racial basis) to the massively inefficient infrastructure and agriculture needed to sustain them.

        When I say that the US and Canada continue to practice settler colonialism and still have a settler mode of production, I mean it quite literally. North american suburbs are notorious for their urban sprawl, that is, uncontrolled expansion, which is/was fueled by tearing apart dense developments suitable for the lifestyles of the proletariat. Not to mention that the urban proletariat’s production is siphoned off to the suburbs via the government.

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree wholeheartedly with your point.

          The only problem is that utterly massive portions of the black community, Latino community, Asian communities, and other races all participate in that “suburban settlerism”. Making race based division in this case pointless.