• _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Don’t worry everyone, it’s like the Sorting Hat, it takes your preference into account. Just say “not TempleOS” and you’ll get into Linux.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What kind of Bizzaro world reverse order is this nonsense? Mac is worse than Windows is worse than Linux.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    cope and seethe. Haven’t had an issue with either my debian desktop nor my debian laptop in the 5 years I’ve been running it on them. Sounds like you’re just mad your OS constantly advertises paid services to you, and mine doesn’t.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not unless they want me to be their bull

        Listen, it’s a funny hyperbolic way of saying “stay mad”; don’t let sex-negative reactionaries have all the fun phrases

  • Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Working computer? Apple? Tell that to my dad. He destroys a Mac in about two years. Bought his house 7 years ago, and three dead macs in the basement.

    Could you imagine if he used a PC?

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Once, when I started a new job, I had to use an Apple laptop until my Linux laptop came. While the Apple laptop was better than I expected, it was still one of the most annoying weeks of my life. The most unbearable part was the keyboard. I could never tell which hotkeys used ctrl and what used alt, and it just wasn’t worth the effort of remembering the differences or remapping them.

    But besides that, after using Linux for 15 years, the very basic levels of configurability that the Apple window manager provides just made it look like a child’s toy compared to Linux. In Linux, there are so many different window managers that it becomes very easy to customize an environment that works perfectly for you. With Apple, you just get what you’re given and if it’s bad or doesn’t work well for your habits, then tough luck, you’re stuck with it anyway. So in that respect, Apple computers don’t work at all - you work for the computer, whereas it should be the other way around.

    But at the end of the day, what it really comes down to is the fact that people just like what they’re used to, and it sucks to change. What’s best is a matter of preference; none is better objectively better than the other.

    Except Windows. Fuck Windows.

    • Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Same for me. I can’t stand the weird keyboard combinations and I totally hate that I need to watch a 1 second eyecandy animation when I put a window in full screen.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      On paper Macs are very good computers. In practice whenever I try to use one I go strict Boomer Mode and can’t get anything done.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Where is BSD? I feel like there are still steps before you reach TempleOS.

    • FuzzyDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He was also incredibly racist and extremely homophobic even before his schizophrenia got bad. I don’t want to play suffering Olympics here but you can suffer from mental health issues and still be an awful person.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I took it as a lighthearted jab at the user of the OS, not as an insult at the creator of the OS. I have mad respect to Terry.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    The reason MacOS is seen as a working computer is because if anything breaks about it, it isn’t considered a computer anymore by Apple, it is considered e-waste.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I guess I don’t get this attitude about macs. I switched to mac when I was traveling a lot in 2007 and saw how portable they could be compared to other laptops. It’s almost 2025 and I just bought my third one last year. My kids are still using my 13 year old MBA for homework, and the hardware is absolutely solid.

      Edit: Lol, downvote reality. My favorite pastime.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Did you have anything break on them? Because that was my point.

        Repairing Macs costs a fortune, because Apple rather you buy something new than repair them.

        I still have a Windows 98 machine that fully functions. It is just slow.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, you take it back in and they fix it. Or you fix it yourself. Just like any other computer. If your issue is something hardware related, Apple will still fix it, it just costs a lot because you’re paying for it in every part of the engineering. You can also go to third party repair shops and have them fix it for cheaper.

          I gave a friend a powermac g5 that I had gotten for free as a teen, gave it to them 10 years ago, and it still works too, it’s just slow. That means nothing.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They put out the best commodity hw on the market IMO. The rest is subjective, and everyone is entitled to their preferences.

          Also no mention that macos actually flows from the last Berkeley release of BSD and still has significant interoperability/portability with other variants. Oh well.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        43 minutes ago

        You don’t get this attitude about Macs? Are you willfully blind?

        Plug a 1080p monitor into a Windows or Linux machine and notice how text is crisp and readable, because they use sub-pixel text rendering, a technique in use for decades to make text readable on lower resolution monitors.

        Now plug that monitor into a MacOS computer and notice the text looks like trash because Apple ripped out their sub-pixel text rendering system to force users to buy their fancy high res monitors.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Font rendering on Linux is still hit and miss. Recently had to troubleshoot an issue where only the titles of Wikipedia articles in Flatpak Firefox on OpenSUSE looked like ass, with other text, or all text in other browsers and another distro rendering OK.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I don’t actually own a 1080p monitor (nor an apple one), and that’s a pretty specific reason to hate macs of high resolution is your desire. I’m sure there are no similar issues with other platforms that someone could find as a reason to [presumably] turn their PCs into ewaste- which is the actual topic of this thread.

          Hyperbolic much?

          From another thread on this topic:

          Even Microsoft themselves are moving away from it. They just left it on Windows as is for those who use old, standard-res LCD. Their subpixel antialiasing (ClearType) has been disabled by default on Microsoft Office (and many of their productivity products) for years.

          The reason why they are moving away from subpixel antialiasing is because, the sole reason for it exist is for the shortcoming of standard LCD, where it has a big “pixel” that consist of row of RGB “subpixel”. Say if you want to draw a line of 1.5px, obviously you can’t divide that pixel in half. What people did was by using some of the “subpixel” to made up that 0.5px (e.g. it’ll only light up the blue subpixel if the 0.5px is to the left, or conversely the red subpixel if it’s tho the right). Here is an example. By using subpixel rendering on standard LCD, you can “fool” the user by adding that extra colour on the side, which when viewed on standard LCD, it will look smooth rather than those jagged colour.

          Now, obviously this “illusion” will only work on display with big pixel consist of (in order) red, green, and blue subpixel. Now, since many people are moving away toward high resolution display (Apple’s main reason) and there are many other display type with different subpixel arrangements (Microsoft’s main reason, and also Apple’s with their OLED products), there is no reason to use subpixel rendering anymore (in fact, using it on any display other than LCD will look worse).

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I don’t actually own a 1080p monitor (nor an apple one), and that’s a pretty specific reason to hate macs of high resolution is your desire.

            No it is one example amongst hundreds of Apple not prioritizing backwards compatibility or even just third party compatibility, because it would be a little extra effort for a couple software engineers, and as a result we get piles and piles of physical e-waste.

            As a company Apple takes no responsibility for their role in compatibility and ensuring that our (society’s) broad ecosystem of products keeps functioning, they only put effort into making sure that their products, that they profit off of, work and keep working.

            • credo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              A little extra effort times “hundreds” of examples is a lot of extra effort…

              Okay then. Thanks for your viewpoint.

              • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I could never imagine playing defense for a trillion dollar company. “It works for me so I like it.” is a perfectly valid response, but you’re trying to somehow defend their horrible practice of a walled garden, a practice that creates huge amounts of e-waste.

                • credo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  No one defended walled gardens. The conservation was about deprecating lesser used functions. Stop trying to use terms you don’t seem to understand.

              • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                So in your opinion, a trillion dollar company that made billions and billions in pure profit after all their salaries and costs, over the course of decades, can decide that they have no responsibility to reduce e-waste and everyone else in society should throw their stuff out and pay them more money?

                And that’s ok to you? On a moral and ethical level?

                How the honest fuck are you defending an excessively profitable company not supporting (and in several cases, explicitly going out of their way to break) third party accessories and forcing consumers to pay more money and generate more e-waste?

                Or is your opinion is that you bought into the Apple ecosystem, so they can do no wrong?

                • credo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  WTF are you smoking? I just pointed out my last laptop from them is 13 years old and still going strong. Show me another brand that lasts like that.

                  Let me be clear: FUCK OFF

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This was a problem when they were selling Apple IIs

      MUGs came into being because Apple provided zero support and overcharged for proprietary hardware. So the only recourse was to find a hobbyist, and they were glad to help.

  • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I tried to be unbiased, but failed. Apple and Linux should be switched.

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t know about macOS, but from experience, neither Linux nor Windows are actually “just works”. Although it will depend on distro, I definitely have different experience on Arch and Manjaro than say Mint users. Mint worked for me well, although older dependencies have also killed “just works” a few times.