• Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    If your solution to anything is “make it worse for [other people]” then you probably aren’t approaching the problem from a healthy place.

    • br3d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      In an unbalanced system, rebalancing looks like “making things worse” if you’re one of the people who currently benefits from the imbalance. “If all you’ve ever known is privilege, equality feels like oppression”, as the saying goes.

      The status quo is not balanced, equitable or fair. Motorists are routinely harmony pedestrians, cyclists, asthmatics, people who don’t want diabetes, people who don’t want Alzheimer’s, the climate, etc etc etc. Because our streets are currently arranged to place motorists ahead of people who don’t create danger and pollution, it’s reasonable to make things “harder” for motorists if we want a world that is safer and greener.

    • fpslem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Would you feel better if it said “stop heavily subsidizing driving” instead?