https://old.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/1k7n9t5/lmaooooooo/mozv556/

content of the forbidden unpublished comment:

 

American’s favorite use of social machines since March 2013, dehumanizing people they disagree with and creating sub-human populations using computers and information networks. Endless messages and signals to dehumanize and hate harder upon those “others”. Nothing can keep Americans from mimicking this use of Twitter that Donald Trump has inspired since 2013. Elon Musk became so drawn in by Donald Trump’s ability to mass dehumanize people of the world using social machines and information networks, he purchased Twitter in 2022 to further the process. USA people on every social platform continue to further and further the mass dehumanization values every single day. Sickening, very sick USA society since 2013 and what is happening with Tweet-thinking anti-humanism values in April 2025 can’t even be described in languages.

    • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.ee
      shield
      OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This honestly just reads like gibberish.

      Perhaps you need to brush up on your language skills, reading comprehension, diversity of people who don’t write only the way authors and content creators you enjoy compose English. I am teaching Lemmy instructions on this topic over in the Lemmy community: !BabelTower@lemm.ee about the age-old problem of “Tower of Babel” metaphor conflicts between people.

       

      This honestly just reads like gibberish.

      Are you suggesting the owners of Reddit media platform, the people who hire the software developers, should forbidden / censor / ban “gibberish” because it causes so much ego shock among consumers of content? Is that the purpose of your reply, to suggest Reddit did a “good job” not publishing my comment, to protect the public? Or are you only replying to insult me personally, Stephen Alfred Gutknecht, in your expression of egoism about your “personal good taste” in communications over the topic of society and democracy issues in April 2025? Or some other reason?

      This honestly just reads like gibberish.

      Do you go around in public and tell people their voice sounds poor, not as good as the Hollywood actors or podcasters you listen to? Do you feel compelled to offer critique of other people’s writing that you can’t comprehend, without asking any specific questions as to what they mean or intended to convey in their communications?

      Let’s start with the first sentence of my Reddit comment message: “American’s favorite use of social machines since March 2013, dehumanizing people they disagree with”

      1. Do you know what “American’s” means, as in people who are in the nation of “United States of America”, were Reddit and Twitter media platforms originated and are centered?

      2. Do you know how time frames work, what “March 2013” means in the opening sentence of my message?

      3. Do you know what a social machine is? Like Lemmy and Reddit and Twitter computing machines?

      4. Do you know what “favorite use of” means?

      5. “dehumanizing people they disagree with” - do you know what that means?

      I have now idea how vast your reading level is or your ability to comprehend anything outside of memes and images, so you have to help me out here.

       

      ::: _____________
      “English, strictly speaking, is not my first language by the way. I haven’t yet discovered what my first language is so for the time being I use English words in order to say things. I expect I will always have to do it that way; regrettably I don’t think my first language can be written down at all. I’m not sure it can be made external you see. I think it has to stay where it is; simmering in the elastic gloom betwixt my flickering organs.” ― Claire-Louise Bennett

      • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow! 🤣

        I’ll just do us both a favor and block this community. Best of luck to you.

        • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.ee
          shield
          OPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ll just do us both a favor and block this community.

          Why? You haven’t answered any of my questions? Is this what you do, dehumanize and burn books of authors you don’t agree with?

          Do you know in 1935 Germany they didn’t have Unicode text on screens, they had to burn magazines and books printed on paper of people they disliked and disagree with?

          These are not rhetorical questions, please answer.

           

          ::: _____________
          “For when I speak of the banality of evil, I do so only on the strictly factual level, pointing to a phenomenon which stared one in the face at the trial. Eichmann was not Iago and not Macbeth, and nothing would have been farther from his mind than to determine with Richard III ‘to prove a villain.’ Except for an extraordinary diligence in looking out for his personal advancement, he had no motives at all… He merely, to put the matter colloquially, never realized what he was doing… It was sheer thoughtlessness—something by no means identical with stupidity—that predisposed him to become one of the greatest criminals of that period. And if this is ‘banal’ and even funny, if with the best will in the world one cannot extract any diabolical or demonic profundity from Eichmann, this is still far from calling it commonplace… That such remoteness from reality and such thoughtlessness can wreak more havoc than all the evil instincts taken together which, perhaps, are inherent in man—that was, in fact, the lesson one could learn in Jerusalem.” ― Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil