• Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Bud, that link specifically lists nuclear energy as being sustainable and green. Did you not understand that, or were you just hoping nobody would actually click on the link?

    • cloud
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t, learn how to read

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the link

        The role of non-renewable energy sources in sustainable energy has been controversial. Nuclear power is a low-carbon source whose historic mortality rates are comparable to those of wind and solar, but its sustainability has been debated because of concerns about radioactive waste, nuclear proliferation, and accidents.

        They’re literally explaining to you why the contraversy even exists, which is oil propaganda.

        Nuclear is green. It’s emissions are almost zero greenhouse gases and won’t contribute to global warming.

        • cloud
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to have reading issues. Nuclear is not green