Firstly I’m so sorry it’s an NST link - their news portal is infested with annoying ads that affects readability.

Secondly, I wish our journalists did the work to provide more context. Why is this an issue? What was the objection??

  • cendawanita@monyet.ccOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the added context, that’s useful! I’m of a different opinion on the function of public healthcare though, thank you

    • AwesomeSteve@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some additional contexts from Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye [1].

      NO one said vaping is a safe alternative to smoking.

      So why are we now legitimising vaping when we are taking steps to introduce an anti-smoking law?

      Currently, the law regarding the possession, distribution, and advertisement of electronic smoking devices (ESD) is too loose, allowing underage citizens to freely buy the products either at physical stores or online platforms.

      Youths and children are easily attracted to ESD, commonly known as vapes, as they perceive the device as “the lesser evil”, cool and “harmless”.

      Long story short, the move is viewed as a giant-ass obvious eyesore trojan horse for the Generational Endgame Bill which aims to stop and prevent smoking and vaping among children and teenagers, our future generations.

      [1] https://www.thesundaily.my/opinion/support-the-generational-endgame-bill-GK10927515