• Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Confirmation bias is super strong with those people too.

    You get in online arguments and they eventually, after much reluctance, cough up the sources you ask for. Always fringe, unknown, highly skewed sources. And of course anything that gets more than 100 sessions a month is mainstream and corrupt. Including scientific journals

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol right. You could show them a scientific journal that’s been ratified and endorsed by the global scientific community, and they’ll say they’re being paid by the global elites to push a narrative.