Now have direct reports under me. No idea wtf I’m doing, I guess I did a good job? Any advice you have for me?
You must log in or register to comment.
You need to understand very soon that you can no longer have projects assigned to you. Everything your management asks you to do is actually something that they want you to ensure gets finished- you are not supposed to do it yourself. Delegate, follow up, and guide someone else to do it.
The moment you take a project on by yourself, you’ve become a huge bottleneck for your entire team’s productivity. Your team needs your guidance and help, and you can’t offer that if you’re designing, coding, and debugging a project on your own.
98% of coding for you should be paired programming from here on out, where you are not the developer at the keyboard. You are providing suggestions and guidance so that experience can transfer to your junior team members.
Edit: You are not just a “tech lead,” you are a manager if you have direct reports.
Hope you like Jira, confluence, and neverending meetings.
Haha yeah, I really avoid “stepping” up career wise, I rather like to code (and guide the “managers” (and other team members) in technical “questions”).
The first and third items are not a big deal for me tbh. Confluence, on the other hand, is pain. Useless, expensive, buggy pain.
Keep faking it, everyone else is too.
Set up 1on1s with your team. Weekly or biweekly, depending on level and team size.
The other, most important task is to delegate. Learn how to identify when you should step back and let your team solve a problem. Lead from the front, but start to learn how to effectively delegate. This is the thing I’ve seen many others struggle with as they get promoted.
You are no longer a dev. You are now your team. Your future success depends on not only your own performance, but your whole team.
1:1s have been the most important thing for me as a lead. Gives you a chance to know your team, what they’re good at, what they struggle with. Let’s you head off a bad direction early. When your directs have a non urgent question they’ll probably save it for your next meeting rather than pinging you constantly with everything that jumps into their mind.
30 minutes with a teammate getting them unstuck is more impactful than 30 minutes of coding on some random feature
Join us at [email protected]
The community is still small but you can ask questions and there are some good resources there already.
Joined. Thanks!
I highly recommend the book First Among Equals. It’s specifically about running a team of developers and managing them well. I found it full of good ideas and it’s specific to tech as well, it’s not just general management advice.
Also start improving your “management” skills. Someone recently linked me this list, there are some great resources for senior devs/tech leads on there as well: https://github.com/kuchin/awesome-cto
For me tech leadership is mostly about making the team run as efficiently as possible. Code reviews, pair programming, 1 on 1s, facilitating design discussions, etc
I also talk more with architects, product management etc and prepare the work for the team on a feature level. This also gives me opportunity to delegate part of the work so others can grow too.
Tech Lead means different things at different companies. You say you have direct reports, do you mean you do their performance evaluations or not? If so then I’d call that a manager. To me that’s where the difference is. If you handle any of the “HR” parts of the process (for lack of a better term) then that’s a manager.
I ask what you mean because the advice differs.
For example, I was a tech lead but not a manager. It was sort of funny, sometimes my team would ask me if it was okay if they took off or left early and I’d explain to them that “I’m not your boss” lol. Basically I’d tell them I have no problems with it but I’m not really the person who can grant that or whatever. The sort of role a tech lead has (at least in the context I was in) was maybe something like a team captain. If folks didn’t have specific tasks in the sprint they wanted to work on I’d assign it to them. Most folks never really had a preference but I never wanted to seem like I was being bossy.
Same here. I’m a Tech Lead right now, but I still live in the code. I see myself as on-trajectory to Architect. I have no direct-reports or any of the responsibilities they go with direct-reports. That role is called a Team Lead at my company (which is on-trajectory for management). I stay at from that stuff like the plague 🤮
I think it also depends on how you structure teams.
In the companies I worked at and experienced as contractor, product/project teams and HR-relevant teams were two almost separate org charts. That is, the guy who says to me what to do is not the guy who tells me how much money I’ll get for that.
Lead devs in this sense are “leading” a project or product, so they do have to deal with the day to day bullshit of human interaction, product meetings, etc., but most people wouldn’t call their fellow devs “reports”.
Yeah, I’m approving PTO and doing performance reviews. I was told that 30-40% of my time will be spent on coding, the lesser the better if I can unlock my team.
Your new job is to regularly listen to your direct reports and help them succeed. You will do less of your own work. Don’t work more to offset. Consider taking notes or making to-do lists to keep track of your tasks.
Good luck, congrats!
Have fun spelling shit out for the product owner.
Sincerely, A product owner
Schedule monthly 1 on 1s, set individual goals to help them when review time comes.
Welcome to hell.
Middle Management type of jobs are demanding and frustrating. You have to keep your superiors happy, and also keep a close relationship with your team members. It’s not an easy role to keep everything balanced.
If you manage to slowly work your way up in the corporate ladder, things might become better.
That really depends on the culture of the company and your mindset. If you think it is going to be hell it is going to feel like hell.
You work more with people and less with computers, but ultimately you are still working on solving problems. Instead of inside code on a computer it is inside a team within a larger organization.
That might be the case, I only have experience in big companies, where you were an insignificant cog in a mechanism nobody understands.
