• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because it makes no sense as an insult.

      Essentially just boils down to: “You care about other people you evil scumbag. Not like me, I’m a patriot, I’ve got mine, screw everyone else.”

      And then they claim you’ve been “owned”, which they have to tell you, because otherwise it isn’t apparent.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leftists sometimes use it as an insult because liberals are still capitalists or because liberals in the U.S. have an ineffective "reach across the aisle, " “civility politics” reputation. I’ve mostly heard it from tankies (who are not leftists, IMO) or from leftist using it in more of a tounge-in-cheek manner though.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Essentially just boils down to: “You care about other people you evil scumbag. Not like me, I’m a patriot, I’ve got mine, screw everyone else.”

        I’ve learned that liberal has a very different meaning if it comes from tankies, communists or non-americans than it does if if it comes from a Republican, and my knowledge of world politics is honestly too limited to fully understand why that is and if it’s for different reasons for each of the above groups

        But I agree with the person you’re replying to, everyone I’ve encountered who uses “liberals” as an insult has not been a terribly pleasant person to interact with.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not a tankie but a leftist. Liberalism enshrines private property rights and free markets as tenets of freedom. From a leftist perspective, it’s equivalent to stating that the only way to end gun violence is more guns. It’s not just wrong to state, it’s antithetical to the goal.

          It’s not being used like conservatives use it (any one left of me politically) but in its more traditional sense, the foundation of the US and countries who followed that model (most “developed” countries)

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah you nailed it, leftists use the term “liberal” in its classic context, as you have described. Tankies tend to use it as a pejorative while other leftists usually use it descriptively, and are more likely to use “neoliberal” pejoratively instead. This does depend on which community you’re browsing though.

            From a leftist perspective, it’s equivalent to stating that the only way to end gun violence is more guns

            Just want to note that Marx said the working class must be armed, and there are many leftists who agree. Gun control is not a left position, it is an authoritarian one. Important distinction imo.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To a U.S. conservative: librul = commy = bad.

          To a tankie: librul = conservative with extra steps = bad.

          That’s the short and sweet of it.

    • propaganja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it might be because you’re a liberal—one who believes that liberals are beyond reproach.

      • Roundcat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or I never see communists here talk about fascists and the far right the same way they talk about liberals or anyone else on or near the left who doesn’t quite meet their purity test. Almost as if they prefer the company of nazis.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go to any place gamers chat and you will see people hating each other over specific games or genres far more than talking about the politics hovering over gaming. Internal fighting is always going to be loudest when there is not any major external work to be done.

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      It means “brigading”, specifically “brigading by shitpost”, basically “bullying”. They use the term themselves for their own behaviour on communities outside of their own instance here on lemmy, and it is very typical of their authoritarian beliefs.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basically means they all say it’s fine because America did XYZ over and over. Or call people liberals until they feel better about themselves.

      • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except this community doesn’t link to the original comment and tell everyone to go fuck with them

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say a thing that pisses them off on any random community.

      They link and @you in their “dunk” community and try to bait you into replying there.

      Or, they just use that post as a rally to get people to come to the thread you were on.

      They then hammer you with “well america is terrible too” and genocide denial and just general shittiness. Essentially trying to one up you any way they can, then congratulating themselves on “dunking” you.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s perplexing is how the use of terminology (everyone is librul) is straight from the capitalist newspeak dictionary. Why the insistence to follow and strengthen capitalist dogma but be against capitalist hegemony in name

  • NotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If censorship is filtering, then I guess jailing journalists means affordable state housing for people of the press

    These mental gymnastics are just something else