With literally no communication, that student has bigger things to worry about than grades, like why are Mommy and Daddy shutting me out?
With literally no communication, that student has bigger things to worry about than grades, like why are Mommy and Daddy shutting me out?
If teachers refers to our current style of teaching in public education, then maybe.
Japan is such an anomaly. They are certain ways that don’t exist anywhere else, that would be impossible anywhere else. If Japan didn’t exist, I wouldn’t have believed it could.
Also they’ve been paying for stuff with their phones for years and years—on exactly what basis are they a cash society (though there’s nothing wrong with that)?
I understand what you’re saying. It’s just my opinion that you’re woefully ignorant. Sorry if this upsets you, cheers.
They unequivocally are, yes.
So if the argument were about whether a license was important, in the general case, as a selling pointl for books, I would have no choice but to concede.
I’m two weeks late but It needs to be said: fuck right off with that kind of talk. I don’t know anything about you, but I know you probably won’t agree when I say that that is a profoundly wrong, almost evil way of thinking.
My parents are American. My sister is an American. Japanese citizens during WW2 were American. Muslim citizens are American.
Jewish citizens of Germany were German.
I mean, it might be because you’re a liberal—one who believes that liberals are beyond reproach.
That’s why you need prebiotics, duh.
By your logic, if you’re a good person but you spend your disposable income on a form of recreation that inefficiently brings positivity to the world, you deserve to be ridiculed and your suffering is justly celebrated.
It’s not uncommonly used in Buddhism. I don’t see it all over the place, but seeing it is completely unremarkable. Just from anecdotal experience I can still say pretty confidently that nobody gives a fuck.
You’re saying you think conservative Americans want to stop him?
I’m not sure you’re really trying to understand the problem here. Why do you think people don’t want to answer the question?
It’s a simple question with an obvious answer. The real question is, why would you ask that? You’re not just looking for a, “Yes.” The obvious suspicion is that it’s a leading question, and you’ll use it to try and coerce a subsequent point. It doesn’t matter if you’re genuinely not trying to do that. It’s upon you to recognize how your own question may be perceived.
The reason the guy replied, “define kids, etc” was because he was already anticipating that this isn’t the real answer you’re looking for. I can say with considerable confidence that the vast majority of people here will understand this.
I agree that kids should not be exposed to porn.
I have no high regard for the guy, but are you seriously, like seriously seriously, trying to tell people that Jordan Peterson depends on his professional title for… literally anything?
Are you saying that without it, he will lose a non-trivial amount of… anything?
“Bro, do you know what really sucks? Not having best-in-class third-party audited end-to-end encryption so nobody ever finds out about all the shit we’re about to get up to. Like, do you even wanna do drugs, bro?”
If that 3% is made up of an outsized share of power users they might be ok. I’m more worried about the power structure shenanigans that have been going on the past few years.
Uh I haven’t but isn’t that written by Gary Webb?
I wasn’t trying to be serious, if that wasn’t clear.