• eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorrry Ma’am, we know your ex husband is trying to kill you but it would be inhumane to lock him in prison. We can offer you a place in our maximum security safehouse though, it has armed guards, windows barred and lockdown every night.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have a read of this: https://lemmy.nz/comment/2326509

      It’s not about ruling out detaining people. It’s that prison is a terrible answer to the problem. Some person thinks that crime is acceptable. Let’s put them in a building full other other people who think that crime is acceptable, so the only people the associate with are criminals. It’s a system that makes more criminals, and it will be seen as obviously a bad idea in 100 years.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, prisons are a waste of money. Better to compost criminals instead, thus they will be able to provide some benefit to the society.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, you don’t get it. We’re going to rehabilitate them with the power of understanding, and something about decolonisation. And then keep a really close eye on them.

      I mean, there’s a argument to be made for better rehabilitation and training for prisoners, but this is ridiculous.

      • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your first sentence mocks and derides anybody who advocated for rehabilitation and training of prisoners. What a sleazy way to doublespeak.