• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I generally support such things, how about because the dominant EV manufacturer is not unionized and these companies are already struggling for relevance? There has to be a balance between treating employees fairly and maintaining a successful business. Hopefully the results will be somewhere in that balance zone

    • Rekhyt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Show me the (unbiased) research that says American auto makers’ problems are having a unionized workforce.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Clearly not, but if they’re already struggling to remain relevant in this transition, paying significantly more to employees won’t help. I mean, they offered 20% raises, UAW counters 40%: let’s all meet at 30% with retraining, job transfer guarantees, insourcing, and get back to work. Given all the press about fewer parts, fewer workers, legacy automakers’ habit of mass layoffs to start over with newer cheaper labor, previous policies of outsourcing to non-union contractors, there’s a lot more to good quality jobs than just the pay

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no balance. If you can’t treat employees fairly you don’t have a successful business. You have a slave shop