The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s not reproduction of content so isn’t a copyright violation. Not shouldn’t be. Literally right now is not.

    The whole reason people are so up in arms about this is that we do not currently have laws or even standards that accurately police this kind of thing.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is not for you to decide. That is for a court to decide. By the letter of the law, and how current copyright law is written, it very clearly is.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am describing the current situation. You are the one describing events you hope to occur.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No I’m looking at this the way a lawyer does.

            You know, like for court.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That you think I am defending the people using Fry’s voice here is just further confirmation that you don’t understand what I’m saying.

                I’m saying there aren’t laws or standards that accurately restrict this usage, and that is a bad thing and why people are upset.